From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0A525E00957; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:41:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D3AE00830 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D30486002097; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:39:43 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1428431983; bh=WQbPdw1R9XgUDpx21F2Ql9/l+kCNcE7wQqv5tXxz6r8=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=+dzXAiYsOH3PM/T7KYAvOzhyVX7yDUM2S2dIWaK18bONJ0WVJNEK1J3CiSOTSRpgr 0mc6hey+BQHu/YiARkSFO3bZg2JZBxcLHQGIEYe5Sge2QqQBD55ht/nsloldo9wS2K x+rSNU57jMDEkIowTmpkk8PTgt10lpuUmUBvEHCg= Message-ID: <5524246F.9030108@mail.bg> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:39:43 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas References: <5523D49E.9070407@mlbassoc.com> <5523F655.90702@mlbassoc.com> <55241006.4070804@mail.bg> <5524110A.7040302@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <5524110A.7040302@mlbassoc.com> Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm] Build for SabreSD? X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:41:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Gary, On 04/07/2015 08:16 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2015-04-07 11:12, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> Hi Gary, >> >> On 04/07/2015 06:23 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> On 2015-04-07 07:16, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> Hello Gary, >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>>> I'm trying to build for SabreSD using the current master: >>>>> MACHINE = "imx6qsabresd" >>>>> meta = >>>>> "master:9e4adec98db325112ca7a8b9dd95722d4d0ab642" >>>>> meta-fsl-arm = >>>>> "master:bfe01a0ebde407086f4a7710ea165c6beff310d7" >>>>> meta-fsl-arm-extra = >>>>> "master:49843fbd4cdfcdd37ad191dbf4bdc63e06cf1e0e" >>>>> >>>>> Out of the box, I get this error/warning: >>>>> ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide >>>>> virtual/kernel >>>>> (/local/poky-master/meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-rt_3.10.31.bb >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /local/poky-master/meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.19.bb). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This usually means one provides something the other doesn't and >>>>> should. >>>> >>>> I will check. >>>> >>>>> Which kernel should this board use? Is it compatible with >>>>> the latest (3.10.53 based) graphics? >>>> >>>> The 3.10.53 kernel works fine with SabreSD. >>> >>> Thanks, I got that going. However, I don't have anything on HDMI in >>> Linux >>> (U-Boot does see it and puts up the FreeScale logo). >>> >>> What do I need to get Linux to use the HDMI video? Some command line >>> option? >> >> As far as I remember, there are no video arguments passed to the >> kernel, so you can check this out. > > What do you mean? > > I'm not getting any HDMI video from Linux, but I am from U-Boot, so > there needs to be something else... Exactly. In order to have a working video interface in Linux, you need to pass the proper bootargs to the kernel, like this: setenv bootargs console=... root=... video=mxcfb0:dev=hdmi,1280x800M@60 >>>>> n.b. I'm chasing some i.MX6 HDMI video issues and trying to use >>>>> this board as a reference. >>>> >>>> Oh, those... Nitrogen has got 3.10.53 last days as well. Regards, Nikolay