From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Intel Cache Monitoring: Current Status and Future Opportunities Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 12:30:28 +0100 Message-ID: <55251154.3020807@eu.citrix.com> References: <20150404020423.22875.23590.stgit@Solace.station> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150404020423.22875.23590.stgit@Solace.station> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli , Xen-devel Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Dongxiao Xu , JBeulich@suse.com, Chao Peng List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/04/2015 03:14 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > ### Per-vCPU cache monitoring > > This means being able to tell how much of the L3 is being used by each vCPU. > Monitoring the cache occupancy of a specific domain, would still be possible, > just by summing up the contributions from all the domain's vCPUs. One note about this -- vcpu cache utilization may be predictive short-term, but long-term it's probably less important because the guest may move processes between vcpus. So it may make sense to leave the occupancy stats on a per-domain basis anyway. Thoughts? -George