From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Networking Developer Mailing List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TSO on veth device slows transmission to a crawl
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 10:20:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5525634A.10207@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1504081844390.6502@nerf40.vanv.qr>
On 04/08/2015 10:09 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> The problem won't manifest with netperf even if run for extended
> period (60 seconds). netperf is probably too smart, exploiting some
> form of parallelism.
Heh - I rather doubt netperf is all that smart. Unless you use the
likes of the -T global option to bind netperf/netserver to specific
CPUs, it will just blythly run wherever the stack/scheduler decides it
should run.
It is though still interesting you don't see the issue with netperf. I
don't know specifically how xinetd-chargen behaves but if it is like the
chargen of old, I assume that means it is sitting there writing one byte
at a time to the socket, and perhaps has TCP_NODELAY set. If you want
to emulate that with netperf, then something like:
netperf -H <receiver> -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 1 -D
would be the command-line to use.
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-08 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 22:45 TSO on veth device slows transmission to a crawl Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-07 2:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-07 9:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-07 19:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-08 17:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-08 17:20 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2015-04-08 18:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-08 18:19 ` Rick Jones
2015-04-09 9:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-09 10:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-09 10:26 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-09 15:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2015-04-09 15:55 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5525634A.10207@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.