From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yg7qi-0000BV-Ij for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 04:30:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yg7qf-0001Oa-9c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 04:30:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yg7qf-0001Ly-3Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 04:30:05 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t398U3gE019226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 04:30:04 -0400 Received: from [10.34.129.181] (dhcp129-181.brq.redhat.com [10.34.129.181]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t398U2dl022829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 04:30:03 -0400 Message-ID: <55263889.8080000@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:30:01 +0200 From: Michal Privoznik MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Qemu binary and list of supported arches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Dear list, when trying to solve this bug [1] I've realized qemu is not reporting a list of supported architectures for given binary. I mean, we do have 'query-target' but as I understand it it merely reports only the default architecture. For instance for qemu-system-i386 I get 'i386', for -x86_64 I get 'x84_64'. However, other binaries like -ppc or -ppc64 can run other architectures like ppc, ppcle, ppc64, ppc64le and so on. So I believe my question is, now that we have a binary capable of running multiple architectures (and an architecture capable of being run by several binaries) what is the best way to compute the table? Michal 1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209948