From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH] VTd/dmar: Tweak how the DMAR table is clobbered Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:51:08 +0100 Message-ID: <55263D7C.6030308@citrix.com> References: <1428522270-17363-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1428522270-17363-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Xen-devel Cc: Yang Zhang , Kevin Tian List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/04/15 20:44, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Intead of clobbering DMAR -> XMAR and back, clobber to RMAD instead. This > means that changing the signature does not alter the checksum, which allows > the clobbering/unclobbering to be peformed atomically and idempotently, which > is an advantage on the kexec path which can reenter acpi_dmar_reinstate(). Could RMAD be specified as a real table in the future? Does the clobbered name have to start with X to avoid future conflicts? David