From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id DC950E00957; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 06:03:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.213.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0A1E008EC for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 06:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so63749409igb.0 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:03:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W6WK7E2ynkud51YyKfboPzsp6ieEWk4TXN1JLM+CkPw=; b=bkEaIEaIilr3Rjm5GOpMPjQ1I/OOkHL0eavznoGWgo02GHUDWpXTduASkpdM5yAvMg ZCx5oZwmmjQpkiJtEQAnPrkJHoATFrwIuVOIO0gjIxNm1+R/Elu3HfpjF35Nx8YSJPcl ZK5+zoSjNqjkTM6N76cTWW+J/PY2FbrbGlfZJOvSfaFA0vmoRhQp6RxHRlgxDu8YR5t+ /XkiBro1Os1xAHPfslxevoOhWH1M7SoMsJzjU0lziVpU1/CV/Rvefglz0bWPYuuJ0Xjn +M2Q3u23vXKaTpmpHCpmN/hKDZ0zRn73VgCpCmtgIYv+Z5EwqvzZ4n14SqwvkqlvGZ/B RyIQ== X-Received: by 10.50.178.133 with SMTP id cy5mr19239768igc.5.1428584584206; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.83] (dsl-67-204-51-13.acanac.net. [67.204.51.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r39sm8679901ioi.2.2015.04.09.06.03.03 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55267887.80001@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 09:03:03 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <5525A37A.70503@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: dizzy branch X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:03:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 15-04-08 07:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: >> Is there going to be a dizzy branch to meta-ti? > is some change in OE-core master asking for it ? I thought it was traditional to "draw a line in the sand" and say "when dizzy was released, this is how this layer looked". Having a branch named dizzy, I think, would make it easier to base work on a given release. Let's say you release a product based on dizzy and a year from now you want to perform a fresh build on a new machine for your product. Clone all the required repositories and then checkout the dizzy branch in all of them? Also, sometimes nobody notices that a change will affect a given release until months later. So although nothing is obviously asking for it, maybe some changes are causing issues we won't notice until months from now?