From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: memaccess: skipping mem_access_send_req Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: <5527EAD6.6040900@citrix.com> References: <5527E828.8010406@bitdefender.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5527E828.8010406@bitdefender.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Razvan Cojocaru , Gareth Stockwell , "xen-devel (xen-devel@lists.xen.org)" Cc: "stefano.stabellini@citrix.com" , "tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de" , "Ian.Campbell@citrix.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Razvan, On 10/04/15 16:11, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > It's not entirely clear to me what you're trying to do, but if I > understand it correctly, there's always the third option of simply using > the vm_event system as it is now, and when you get an EPT violation > event simply use xc_hvm_inject_trap() from userspace to inject the > exception. xc_hvm_inject_trap is not implemented on ARM. Also, looking to the function, most of the traps and arguments are x86 specific. Regards, -- Julien Grall