From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 50291: regressions - FAIL Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:15:34 +0100 Message-ID: <55280536.5060900@citrix.com> References: <21800.619.924997.751457@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21800.619.924997.751457@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/04/15 18:03, Ian Jackson wrote: > osstest service user writes ("[xen-unstable test] 50291: regressions - FAIL"): >> flight 50291 xen-unstable real [real] >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/50291/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> including tests which could not be run: >> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 11 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 36514 >> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 11 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 36514 > I have done extensive testing of the network and found no network > problems, infrastructure VM stalls, or anything, so I'm pretty sure > these are not infrastructure problems but rather real bugs with the > software under test. > > We believe this to be a bug in FreeBSD and are trying to update to > FreeBSD 10.1 which may fix it. > > We think this is not anything to do with Xen. This bug seems to be > exposed more in the new colo than the old test lab, for some reason. > > These were the only problems in this flight. Under the circumstances > I think we would be justified in force pushing to xen.git#master: > >> version targeted for testing: >> xen 3dca8a17f639f4b53cd2eeb687cec4e9f83acf3d +1, if my vote counts. This will get master substantially closer to staging. ~Andrew