From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.parallels.com (mx2.parallels.com [199.115.105.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCF11A01A7 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:32:44 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <552BD37A.8070505@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:32:26 +0300 From: Pavel Emelyanov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Laurent Dufour Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Introducing arch_remap hook References: <9d827fc618a718830b2c47aa87e8be546914c897.1428916945.git.ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413115811.GA12354@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BB972.3010704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413131357.GC12354@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BC2CA.80309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <552BC619.9080603@parallels.com> <20150413140219.GA14480@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BCE87.8040103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413142655.GA14646@node.dhcp.inet.fi> In-Reply-To: <20150413142655.GA14646@node.dhcp.inet.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: Rik van Riel , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, criu@openvz.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , cov@codeaurora.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >>> I initially thought it would be enough to put it into >>> , expecting it works as >>> . But that's not the case. >>> >>> It probably worth at some point rework all to include >>> at the end as we do for . >>> But that's outside the scope of the patchset, I guess. >>> >>> I don't see any better candidate for such dummy header. :-/ >> >> Clearly, I'm not confortable with a rewrite of :( >> >> So what about this patch, is this v3 acceptable ? > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Other than the #ifdef thing, the same: Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com (mail-pd0-f182.google.com [209.85.192.182]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0766B0032 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:32:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pdbqa5 with SMTP id qa5so109059217pdb.1 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.parallels.com (mx2.parallels.com. [199.115.105.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r6si16093908pdp.208.2015.04.13.07.32.44 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <552BD37A.8070505@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:32:26 +0300 From: Pavel Emelyanov MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Introducing arch_remap hook References: <9d827fc618a718830b2c47aa87e8be546914c897.1428916945.git.ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413115811.GA12354@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BB972.3010704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413131357.GC12354@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BC2CA.80309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <552BC619.9080603@parallels.com> <20150413140219.GA14480@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BCE87.8040103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413142655.GA14646@node.dhcp.inet.fi> In-Reply-To: <20150413142655.GA14646@node.dhcp.inet.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Laurent Dufour Cc: Andrew Morton , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Ingo Molnar , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, cov@codeaurora.org, criu@openvz.org >>> I initially thought it would be enough to put it into >>> , expecting it works as >>> . But that's not the case. >>> >>> It probably worth at some point rework all to include >>> at the end as we do for . >>> But that's outside the scope of the patchset, I guess. >>> >>> I don't see any better candidate for such dummy header. :-/ >> >> Clearly, I'm not confortable with a rewrite of :( >> >> So what about this patch, is this v3 acceptable ? > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Other than the #ifdef thing, the same: Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932175AbbDMOcq (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:32:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:42929 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751425AbbDMOcl (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:32:41 -0400 Message-ID: <552BD37A.8070505@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:32:26 +0300 From: Pavel Emelyanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Laurent Dufour CC: Andrew Morton , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , "Rik van Riel" , Mel Gorman , , , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "Michael Ellerman" , Ingo Molnar , , , Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Introducing arch_remap hook References: <9d827fc618a718830b2c47aa87e8be546914c897.1428916945.git.ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413115811.GA12354@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BB972.3010704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413131357.GC12354@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BC2CA.80309@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <552BC619.9080603@parallels.com> <20150413140219.GA14480@node.dhcp.inet.fi> <552BCE87.8040103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150413142655.GA14646@node.dhcp.inet.fi> In-Reply-To: <20150413142655.GA14646@node.dhcp.inet.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: US-EXCH.sw.swsoft.com (10.255.249.47) To US-EXCH2.sw.swsoft.com (10.255.249.46) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> I initially thought it would be enough to put it into >>> , expecting it works as >>> . But that's not the case. >>> >>> It probably worth at some point rework all to include >>> at the end as we do for . >>> But that's outside the scope of the patchset, I guess. >>> >>> I don't see any better candidate for such dummy header. :-/ >> >> Clearly, I'm not confortable with a rewrite of :( >> >> So what about this patch, is this v3 acceptable ? > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Other than the #ifdef thing, the same: Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov