All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] xen/pvh: use a custom IO bitmap for PVH hardware domains
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:01:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552CE55C.4040603@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428497829-21845-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com>

El 08/04/15 a les 14.57, Roger Pau Monne ha escrit:
> Since a PVH hardware domain has access to the physical hardware create a
> custom more permissive IO bitmap. The permissions set on the bitmap are
> populated based on the contents of the ioports rangeset.
> 
> Also add the IO ports of the serial console used by Xen to the list of not
> accessible IO ports.

I have one question about the current IO port handling for PVH guests
(DomU and Dom0). There's some code right now in vmx_vmexit_handler
(EXIT_REASON_IO_INSTRUCTION) that's kind PVH specific:

if ( exit_qualification & 0x10 )
{
    /* INS, OUTS */
    if ( unlikely(is_pvh_vcpu(v)) /* PVH fixme */ ||
         !handle_mmio() )
        hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_gp_fault, 0);
}
else
{
    /* IN, OUT */
    uint16_t port = (exit_qualification >> 16) & 0xFFFF;
    int bytes = (exit_qualification & 0x07) + 1;
    int dir = (exit_qualification & 0x08) ? IOREQ_READ : IOREQ_WRITE;

    if ( handle_pio(port, bytes, dir) )
        update_guest_eip(); /* Safe: IN, OUT */
}

Is there any need for DomUs to access the IO ports? I know that FreeBSD
will poke at some of them during boot to scan for devices, but I'm not
sure if we could just make them noops in the PVH case and simply return
garbage.

Also, once this is set the PVH Specification document should be updated
to reflect what can guests expect when poking at IO ports.

Roger.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-14 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-08 12:57 [PATCH RFC] xen/pvh: use a custom IO bitmap for PVH hardware domains Roger Pau Monne
2015-04-09 10:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-04-14  8:11   ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-10  1:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-10 11:07   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-04-14  7:57   ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-14  8:06 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-14 10:01 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2015-04-14 10:05   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-04-14 10:31   ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-14 10:45     ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-04-14 11:40       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552CE55C.4040603@citrix.com \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.