Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] q35: implement SMRAM.D_LCK

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 14/04/2015 15:12, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/pci-host/q35.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci-host/q35.c b/hw/pci-host/q35.c
> index 79bab15..9227489 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-host/q35.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-host/q35.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,20 @@ static void mch_update_smram(MCHPCIState *mch)
>      PCIDevice *pd = PCI_DEVICE(mch);
>      bool h_smrame = (pd->config[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC] & MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC_H_SMRAME);
>  
> +    /* implement SMRAM.D_LCK */
> +    if (pd->config[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] & MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM_D_LCK) {
> +        pd->config[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM_D_OPEN;
> +
> +        pd->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM_D_OPEN;
> +        pd->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM_D_LCK;
> +        pd->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM_G_SMRAME;
> +        pd->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM_C_BASE_SEG_MASK;
> +
> +        pd->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC_H_SMRAME;
> +        pd->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC_TSEG_SZ_MASK;
> +        pd->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC] &= ~MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC_T_EN;
> +    }
> +
>      memory_region_transaction_begin();
>  
>      if (pd->config[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] & SMRAM_D_OPEN) {
> @@ -297,7 +311,6 @@ static void mch_write_config(PCIDevice *d,
>  {
>      MCHPCIState *mch = MCH_PCI_DEVICE(d);
>  
> -    /* XXX: implement SMRAM.D_LOCK */
>      pci_default_write_config(d, address, val, len);
>  
>      if (ranges_overlap(address, len, MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_PAM0,
> @@ -351,6 +364,8 @@ static void mch_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>                   MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_PCIEXBAR_DEFAULT);
>  
>      d->config[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] = MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM_DEFAULT;
> +    d->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_SMRAM] = 0xff;
> +    d->wmask[MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_ESMRAMC] = 0xff;

S3, if I remember correctly, should not be able to reset D_LCK.  Does
this do the right thing?

Paolo

>  
>      mch_update(mch);
>  }
>