From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C36F9E0098A; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:01:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, SPF_HELO_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Received: from compulab.co.il (softlayer.compulab.co.il [50.23.254.55]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17293E0076B for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:01:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=compulab.co.il; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=55/20864ttPjcui6UJozRnbweAGd8YyxJK4/vJpzRnU=; b=l8ZmvU+C6QAaTSZiaU/qY2J7/7WTg7NbS1IJ3CTRESyktXbT333XCoUf+8uyCTJZ6oLWvhIM1mEdQNeTNtsPgqFxzUTdZN4bv1kIu1FyuZqCuePo8RqZxClUKTCHp11JtkHXqb9hZYmM0rj3SCj3KTwD+42Pdz1DktIebYzuV10=; Received: from [62.90.235.247] (port=12827 helo=zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il) by softlayer.compulab.co.il with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Yi5DL-0002cG-0k; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:05:35 +0300 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE8048A055; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:05:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id agEWBmKxEth2; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:05:33 +0300 (IDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1BF48A054; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:05:33 +0300 (IDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il Received: from zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id UPiWHE5Onzsm; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:05:33 +0300 (IDT) Received: from [192.168.11.13] (grinberg-linux.compulab.local [192.168.11.13]) by zimbra-mta.compulab.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5152D48A051; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:05:33 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <552D56EC.8000200@compulab.co.il> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:05:32 +0300 From: Igor Grinberg Organization: CompuLab Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , Valentin Raevsky References: <1428745165-24991-1-git-send-email-valentin@compulab.co.il> In-Reply-To: X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - softlayer.compulab.co.il X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - yoctoproject.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - compulab.co.il X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: softlayer.compulab.co.il: acl_c_relayhosts_text_entry: grinberg@compulab.co.il|compulab.co.il Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] u-boot-cm-fx6: add u-boot configuration for cm-fx6 machines X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:01:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 04/13/15 16:35, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Valentin, > Hello Igor, > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Valentin Raevsky > wrote: >> Add u-boot configuration for cm-fx6 machines. >> This is a fork of the mainline u-boot with the CompuLab patches on top. >> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Raevsky > > The U-Boot recipe is very good. The only remark I believe could be > addressed would be to name it u-boot-compulab so it does not sounds to > be machine specific and you have extend it for other machines/sbc/som > in future. I'm not sure I understand this. Suppose, we have several Freescale SoC based machines, using different U-Boot versions from different repositories. How should the recipe be structured/build for such configurations? Or is it assumed that all the boards are supported by the same repository/mainline? -- Regards, Igor.