From: Ray Jui <rjui-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
gregory.0xf0-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
"Jayachandran C
<jchandra-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>;
bcm-kernel-feedback-list"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [V2 1/2] i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:39:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552D7AF5.7040005@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150414134740.GB1375@katana>
Hi Kamal,
+ bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On 4/14/2015 6:47 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:01:05PM -0400, Kamal Dasu wrote:
>> Adding support for i2c controller driver for Broadcom settop
>> SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Wow, this is the third I2C master driver coming from Broadcom in a
> pretty short time. May I ask the authors of the previous Broadcom
> drivers (CCed) to do the initial review?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wolfram
>
>> ---
>> V2 changes
>> - Separate commits for device tree bindings and
>> initial i2c-brcmstb driver code
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c | 703 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 714 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> index 22da9c2..e3938f4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> @@ -392,6 +392,16 @@ config I2C_BCM_KONA
>>
>> If you do not need KONA I2C interface, say N.
>>
>> +config I2C_BRCMSTB
>> + tristate "BRCM Settop I2C adapter"
>> + depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB
Would be nice to add dependency on COMPILE_TEST if you don't mind?
>> + default y
>> + help
>> + If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
>> + I2C interface on the Broadcom Settop SoCs.
>> +
>> + If you do not need I2C interface, say N.
>> +
>> config I2C_BLACKFIN_TWI
>> tristate "Blackfin TWI I2C support"
>> depends on BLACKFIN
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> index 3638feb..91a0b5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_VIPERBOARD) += i2c-viperboard.o
>> # Other I2C/SMBus bus drivers
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ACORN) += i2c-acorn.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BCM_KONA) += i2c-bcm-kona.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BRCMSTB) += i2c-brcmstb.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CROS_EC_TUNNEL) += i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ELEKTOR) += i2c-elektor.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OPAL) += i2c-opal.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b69ab14
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-brcmstb.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,703 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Broadcom Corporation
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
>> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
>> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/version.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
Wolfram would prefer the includes to be sorted in alphabetic order
>> +
>> +#define N_DATA_REGS 8
>> +#define N_DATA_BYTES (N_DATA_REGS * 4)
>> +
>> +/* BSC count register field definitions */
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG1_MASK 0x0000003f
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG1_SHIFT 0
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG2_MASK 0x00000fc0
>> +#define BSC_CNT_REG2_SHIFT 6
>> +
>> +/* BSC CTL register field definitions */
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_DTF_MASK 0x00000003
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_MASK 0x00000030
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT 4
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK 0x00000040
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_SHIFT 6
>> +#define BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK 0x00000080
>> +
>> +/* BSC_IIC_ENABLE r/w enable and interrupt field defintions */
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_RESTART_MASK 0x00000040
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTART_MASK 0x00000020
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTOP_MASK 0x00000010
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_NOACK_MASK 0x00000004
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_INTRP_MASK 0x00000002
>> +#define BSC_IIC_EN_ENABLE_MASK 0x00000001
>> +
>> +/* BSC_CTLHI control register field definitions */
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_INPUT_SWITCHING_LEVEL_MASK 0x00000080
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_DATAREG_SIZE_MASK 0x00000040
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_IGNORE_ACK_MASK 0x00000002
>> +#define BSC_CTLHI_REG_WAIT_DIS_MASK 0x00000001
>> +
>> +#define I2C_TIMEOUT 100 /* msecs */
>> +
>> +/* Condition mask used for non combined transfer */
>> +#define COND_RESTART BSC_IIC_EN_RESTART_MASK
>> +#define COND_NOSTART BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTART_MASK
>> +#define COND_NOSTOP BSC_IIC_EN_NOSTOP_MASK
Is the tab above expected?
>> +#define COND_START_STOP (COND_RESTART | COND_NOSTART | COND_NOSTOP)
>> +
>> +/* BSC data transfer direction */
>> +#define DTF_WR_MASK 0x00000000
>> +#define DTF_RD_MASK 0x00000001
>> +/* BSC data transfer direction combined format */
>> +#define DTF_RD_WR_MASK 0x00000002
>> +#define DTF_WR_RD_MASK 0x00000003
>> +/* default bus speed */
>> +#define DEFAULT_BUS_SPEEDHZ 375000
>> +
>> +struct bsc_regs {
>> + u32 chip_address;
>> + u32 data_in[N_DATA_REGS];
>> + u32 cnt_reg;
>> + u32 ctl_reg;
>> + u32 iic_enable;
>> + u32 data_out[N_DATA_REGS];
>> + u32 ctlhi_reg;
>> + u32 scl_param;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct bsc_clk_param {
>> + u32 hz;
>> + u32 scl_mask;
>> + u32 div_mask;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum bsc_xfer_cmd {
>> + CMD_WR,
>> + CMD_RD,
>> + CMD_WR_NOACK,
>> + CMD_RD_NOACK,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static char const *cmd_string[] = {
>> + [CMD_WR] = "WR",
>> + [CMD_RD] = "RD",
>> + [CMD_WR_NOACK] = "WR NOACK",
>> + [CMD_RD_NOACK] = "RD NOACK",
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum bus_speeds {
>> + SPD_375K,
>> + SPD_390K,
>> + SPD_187K,
>> + SPD_200K,
>> + SPD_93K,
>> + SPD_97K,
>> + SPD_46K,
>> + SPD_50K
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct bsc_clk_param bsc_clk[] = {
two spaces before bsc_clk
>> + [SPD_375K] = {
>> + .hz = 375000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_375K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_390K] = {
>> + .hz = 390000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_390K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_187K] = {
>> + .hz = 187500,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_187K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_200K] = {
>> + .hz = 200000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_200K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = 0
>> + },
>> + [SPD_93K] = {
>> + .hz = 93750,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_375K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + },
>> + [SPD_97K] = {
>> + .hz = 97500,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_390K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + },
>> + [SPD_46K] = {
>> + .hz = 46875,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_187K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + },
>> + [SPD_50K] = {
>> + .hz = 50000,
>> + .scl_mask = SPD_200K << BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT,
>> + .div_mask = BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct brcmstb_i2c_dev {
>> + struct device *device;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + void __iomem *irq_base;
>> + int irq;
>> + struct bsc_regs *bsc_regmap;
>> + struct i2c_adapter adapter;
>> + struct completion done;
>> + bool is_suspended;
>> + u32 clk_freq_hz;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define bsc_readl(_dev, reg) \
>> + __bsc_readl(_dev, offsetof(struct bsc_regs, reg))
>> +
>> +#define bsc_writel(_dev, val, reg) \
>> + __bsc_writel(_dev, val, offsetof(struct bsc_regs, reg))
>> +
>> +static inline u32 __bsc_readl(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + return __raw_readl(dev->base + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void __bsc_writel(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev, u32 val,
>> + u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + __raw_writel(val, dev->base + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + /* Disable BSC CTL interrupt line */
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg &= ~BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK;
What is the purpose of dev->bsc_regmap? For storing cached masked value
of some registers?
>> + barrier();
What is the purpose of the above barrier? Same question applies to all
other places
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg, ctl_reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_enable_irq(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + /* Enable BSC CTL interrupt line */
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg |= BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK;
>> + barrier();
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg, ctl_reg);
>> +}
You should consider combining brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq and
brcmstb_i2c_enable_irq since they access the same register.
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t brcmstb_i2c_isr(int irq, void *devid)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev = devid;
>> + u32 status_bsc_ctl = bsc_readl(dev, ctl_reg);
>> + u32 status_iic_intrp = bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable);
What is the purpose of status_iic_intrp? It's not used any where in the
ISR except the debugging prints.
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "isr CTL_REG %x IIC_EN %x\n",
>> + status_bsc_ctl, status_iic_intrp);
>> +
>> + if (!(status_bsc_ctl & BSC_CTL_REG_INT_EN_MASK))
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> +
>> + brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(dev);
>> + complete_all(&dev->done);
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "isr handled");
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Wait for device to be ready */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_wait_if_busy(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(I2C_TIMEOUT);
>> +
>> + while ((bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable) & BSC_IIC_EN_INTRP_MASK)) {
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> + dev_err(dev->device, "i2c device busy timeout\n");
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
>> + }
In the worst case, the above loop busy waiting for 100 msec? Consider
adding a cpu_relax call to make it more efficient.
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* i2c xfer completion function, handles both irq and polling mode
>> + */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_waitforcompletion(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + unsigned long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(I2C_TIMEOUT);
>> +
>> + if (dev->irq >= 0) {
irq = 0 is not a valid line?
>> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->done, timeout))
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + } else {
>> + /* we are in polling mode */
>> + u32 bsc_intrp;
>> + unsigned long time_left = jiffies + timeout;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + bsc_intrp = bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable) &
>> + BSC_IIC_EN_INTRP_MASK;
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, time_left)) {
>> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + udelay(100);
>> + } while (!bsc_intrp);
Again, with the use of udelay, this is still busy waiting for 100 msec
in the worst case.
>> + brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(dev);
Why is irq disabled called in the case of polling mode but not irq mode?
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Set xfer START/STOP conditions for subsequent transfer */
>> +static void brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + u32 cond_flag)
>> +{
>> + u32 regval = dev->bsc_regmap->iic_enable;
>> +
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->iic_enable = (regval & ~COND_START_STOP) | cond_flag;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Send I2C request */
>> +static int brcmstb_send_i2c_cmd(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd)
>> +{
>> + int rc = 0, ignore_ack = 0;
ignore_ack should be a bool
>> + struct bsc_regs *pi2creg = dev->bsc_regmap;
>> + u32 ctl_reg;
>> +
>> + /* Make sure the hardware is ready */
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_wait_if_busy(dev);
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "%s, %d\n", __func__, cmd);
>> +
>> + /* see if the transaction needs check NACK conditions */
>> + ignore_ack = (cmd == CMD_WR || cmd == CMD_RD) ? 0 : 1;
>> + if (ignore_ack)
>> + pi2creg->ctlhi_reg |= BSC_CTLHI_REG_IGNORE_ACK_MASK;
>> + else
>> + pi2creg->ctlhi_reg &= ~BSC_CTLHI_REG_IGNORE_ACK_MASK;
>> + bsc_writel(dev, pi2creg->ctlhi_reg, ctlhi_reg);
>> +
>> + if (dev->irq >= 0)
>> + reinit_completion(&dev->done);
>> +
>> + /* set data transfer direction */
>> + ctl_reg = pi2creg->ctl_reg & ~BSC_CTL_REG_DTF_MASK;
>> + if (cmd == CMD_WR || cmd == CMD_WR_NOACK)
>> + pi2creg->ctl_reg = ctl_reg | DTF_WR_MASK;
>> + else
>> + pi2creg->ctl_reg = ctl_reg | DTF_RD_MASK;
>> +
>> + /* enable BSC CTL interrupt line */
>> + brcmstb_i2c_enable_irq(dev);
>> +
>> + /* initiate transfer by setting iic_enable */
>> + pi2creg->iic_enable |= BSC_IIC_EN_ENABLE_MASK;
>> + bsc_writel(dev, pi2creg->iic_enable, iic_enable);
>> +
So you only disable the interrupt in the ISR. If the ISR is never fired
for whatever reason, then the interrupt is kept enabled.
A better way to handle this would be to disable the interrupt after
brcmstb_i2c_waitforcompletion (in either sucess or failure case), so
it's consistent that the interrupt always gets disabled after you come
out of this function.
>> + /* Wait for transaction to finish or timeout */
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_waitforcompletion(dev);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + dev_err(dev->device, "intr timeout for cmd %s\n",
>> + cmd_string[cmd]);
>> + goto cmd_out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!ignore_ack && bsc_readl(dev, iic_enable) & BSC_IIC_EN_NOACK_MASK) {
>> + rc = -EREMOTEIO;
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "controller received NOACK intr for %s\n",
>> + cmd_string[cmd]);
>> + }
>> +
>> +cmd_out:
>> + bsc_writel(dev, 0, cnt_reg);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, 0, iic_enable);
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_xfer_bsc_data(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + u8 *buf, unsigned int len,
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd)
>> +{
>> + int i, j, rc;
>> +
>> + /* set the read/write length */
>> + bsc_writel(dev, BSC_CNT_REG1_MASK & (len << BSC_CNT_REG1_SHIFT),
>> + cnt_reg);
What is the max len that can be supported? BSC_CNT_REG1_MASK = 63? Then
you should check against that.
Note Wolfram has introduced a way to validate the supported data length
at the i2c-core, which you should adapt:
commit b7f625840267b18ef1011cba0085bb7e237d76f7
Author: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon Jan 5 23:45:59 2015 +0100
i2c: add quirk checks to core
Let the core do the checks if HW quirks prevent a transfer. Saves code
from drivers and adds consistency.
>> +
>> + /* Write data into data_in register */
>> + if (cmd == CMD_WR || cmd == CMD_WR_NOACK) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
>> + u32 word = 0;
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
>> + word >>= 8;
>> + if ((i + j) < len)
>> + word |= buf[i + j] << 24;
>> + }
>> + bsc_writel(dev, word, data_in[i >> 2]);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Initiate xfer */
>> + rc = brcmstb_send_i2c_cmd(dev, cmd);
>> +
>> + if (rc != 0)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + if (cmd == CMD_RD || cmd == CMD_RD_NOACK) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i += 4) {
>> + u32 data = bsc_readl(dev, data_out[i >> 2]);
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < 4 && (j + i) < len; j++) {
>> + buf[i + j] = data & 0xff;
>> + data >>= 8;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Write a single byte of data to the i2c bus */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_write_data_byte(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + u8 *buf, unsigned int nak_expected)
>> +{
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd = nak_expected ? CMD_WR : CMD_WR_NOACK;
>> +
>> + bsc_writel(dev, 1, cnt_reg);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, *buf, data_in);
>> +
>> + return brcmstb_send_i2c_cmd(dev, cmd);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Send i2c address */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_do_addr(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev,
>> + struct i2c_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> + unsigned char addr;
>> +
>> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN) {
>> +
redundant space
>> + /* First byte is 11110XX0 where XX is upper 2 bits */
>> + addr = 0xF0 | ((msg->addr & 0x300) >> 7);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, addr, chip_address);
>> +
>> + /* Second byte is the remaining 8 bits */
>> + addr = msg->addr & 0xFF;
>> + if (brcmstb_i2c_write_data_byte(dev, &addr, 0) < 0)
>> + return -EREMOTEIO;
>> +
>> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
>> + /* For read, send restart without stop condition */
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev, COND_RESTART
>> + | COND_NOSTOP);
>> + /* Then re-send the first byte with the read bit set */
>> + addr = 0xF0 | ((msg->addr & 0x300) >> 7) | 0x01;
>> + if (brcmstb_i2c_write_data_byte(dev, &addr, 0) < 0)
>> + return -EREMOTEIO;
>> +
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + addr = msg->addr << 1;
>> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
>> + addr |= 1;
>> +
>> + bsc_writel(dev, addr, chip_address);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Master transfer function */
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
>> + struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adapter);
>> + struct i2c_msg *pmsg;
>> + int rc = 0;
>> + int i;
>> + int bytes_to_xfer;
>> + enum bsc_xfer_cmd cmd;
>> + u8 *tmp_buf;
>> + int len = 0;
>> + int ignore_nack = 0;
>> +
>> + if (dev->is_suspended)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + /* Loop through all messages */
>> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>> + pmsg = &msgs[i];
>> + len = pmsg->len;
>> + tmp_buf = pmsg->buf;
>> + ignore_nack = pmsg->flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device,
>> + "msg# %d/%d flg %x buf %x len %d\n", i,
>> + num - 1, pmsg->flags,
>> + pmsg->buf ? pmsg->buf[0] : '0', pmsg->len);
>> +
>> + if (i < (num - 1) && (msgs[i + 1].flags & I2C_M_NOSTART))
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev, ~(COND_START_STOP));
>> + else
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev,
>> + COND_RESTART | COND_NOSTOP);
>> +
>> + /* Send slave address */
>> + if (!(pmsg->flags & I2C_M_NOSTART)) {
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_do_addr(dev, pmsg);
>> + if (rc < 0) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device,
>> + "NACK for addr %2.2x msg#%d rc = %d\n",
>> + pmsg->addr, i, rc);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + cmd = (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? CMD_RD : CMD_WR;
>> +
>> + /* Perform data transfer */
>> + while (len) {
>> + bytes_to_xfer = min(len, N_DATA_BYTES);
>> +
>> + if (ignore_nack || len <= N_DATA_BYTES)
>> + cmd = (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ? CMD_RD_NOACK
>> + : CMD_WR_NOACK;
>> +
>> + if (len <= N_DATA_BYTES && i == (num - 1))
>> + brcmstb_set_i2c_start_stop(dev,
>> + ~(COND_START_STOP));
>> +
>> + rc = brcmstb_i2c_xfer_bsc_data(dev, tmp_buf,
>> + bytes_to_xfer, cmd);
>> + if (rc < 0) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "%s failure",
>> + cmd_string[cmd]);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + len -= bytes_to_xfer;
>> + tmp_buf += bytes_to_xfer;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc = num;
>> +out:
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 brcmstb_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>> +{
>> + return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL | I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR
>> + | I2C_FUNC_NOSTART | I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct i2c_algorithm brcmstb_i2c_algo = {
>> + .master_xfer = brcmstb_i2c_xfer,
>> + .functionality = brcmstb_i2c_functionality,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_set_bus_speed(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int i = 0, num_speeds = ARRAY_SIZE(bsc_clk);
>> + u32 clk_freq_hz = dev->clk_freq_hz;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_speeds; i++) {
>> + if (bsc_clk[i].hz == clk_freq_hz) {
So you only allow an exact rate match? I think a round down of the rate
when not exactly matched might be sufficient?
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg &= ~(BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_MASK
>> + | BSC_CTL_REG_DIV_CLK_MASK);
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg |= (bsc_clk[i].scl_mask |
>> + bsc_clk[i].div_mask);
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctl_reg, ctl_reg);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (i == num_speeds) {
>> + i = (bsc_readl(dev, ctl_reg) & BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_MASK) >>
>> + BSC_CTL_REG_SCL_SEL_SHIFT;
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "invalid input clock-frequency %dHz\n",
>> + clk_freq_hz);
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "leaving current clock-frequency @ %dHz\n",
>> + bsc_clk[i].hz);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void brcmstb_i2c_set_bsc_reg_defaults(struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + /* 4 byte data register */
>> + dev->bsc_regmap->ctlhi_reg = BSC_CTLHI_REG_DATAREG_SIZE_MASK;
>> + bsc_writel(dev, dev->bsc_regmap->ctlhi_reg, ctlhi_reg);
>> + /* set bus speed */
>> + brcmstb_i2c_set_bus_speed(dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int rc = 0;
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev;
>> + struct i2c_adapter *adap;
>> + struct resource *iomem;
>> + const char *int_name;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate memory for private data structure */
>> + dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dev)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + dev->bsc_regmap = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bsc_regs), GFP_KERNEL);
why can't you use devm_kzalloc here?
>> + if (!dev->bsc_regmap)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
>> + dev->device = &pdev->dev;
>> + init_completion(&dev->done);
>> +
>> + /* Map hardware registers */
>> + iomem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + dev->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev->device, iomem);
>> + if (IS_ERR(dev->base)) {
>> + rc = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto probe_errorout;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rc = of_property_read_string(dev->device->of_node, "interrupt-names",
>> + &int_name);
Why do you need a specific DT property to specify the interrupt name?
Why can't you simply set it to pdev->name?
>> + if (rc < 0)
>> + int_name = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* Get the interrupt number */
>> + dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
No error checking? I guess you rely on devm_request_irq below to do it?
That's probably fine.
>> +
>> + /* disable the bsc interrupt line */
>> + brcmstb_i2c_disable_irq(dev);
>> +
>> + /* register the ISR handler */
>> + rc = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, dev->irq, brcmstb_i2c_isr,
>> + IRQF_SHARED,
>> + int_name ? int_name : pdev->name,
>> + dev);
>> +
>> + if (rc) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev->device, "falling back to polling mode");
>> + dev->irq = -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Add the i2c adapter */
>> + adap = &dev->adapter;
>> + i2c_set_adapdata(adap, dev);
>> + adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
Not needed...
>> + strlcpy(adap->name, "Broadcom STB : ", sizeof(adap->name));
>> + if (int_name)
>> + strlcat(adap->name, int_name, sizeof(adap->name));
>> + adap->algo = &brcmstb_i2c_algo;
>> + adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>> + adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + rc = i2c_add_adapter(adap);
>> + if (rc) {
>> + dev_err(dev->device, "failed to add adapter\n");
>> + goto probe_errorout;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->device->of_node,
>> + "clock-frequency", &dev->clk_freq_hz)) {
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "missing clock-frequency property\n");
>> + dev_warn(dev->device, "setting default clock-frequency %dHz\n",
>> + bsc_clk[0].hz);
>> + dev->clk_freq_hz = bsc_clk[0].hz;
>> + }
>> +
>> + brcmstb_i2c_set_bsc_reg_defaults(dev);
Don't you want to do this before calling i2c_add_adapter?
>> + dev_info(dev->device, "%s@%dhz registered in %s mode\n",
>> + int_name ? int_name : " ", dev->clk_freq_hz,
>> + (dev->irq >= 0) ? "interrupt" : "polling");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +probe_errorout:
>> + kfree(dev->bsc_regmap);
>> + return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + kfree(dev->bsc_regmap);
>> + i2c_del_adapter(&dev->adapter);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + i2c_lock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> + i2c_dev->is_suspended = true;
>> + i2c_unlock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int brcmstb_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct brcmstb_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + i2c_lock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> + brcmstb_i2c_set_bsc_reg_defaults(i2c_dev);
The BSC registers might be reset coming out of deep sleep?
>> + i2c_dev->is_suspended = false;
>> + i2c_unlock_adapter(&i2c_dev->adapter);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(brcmstb_i2c_pm, brcmstb_i2c_suspend,
>> + brcmstb_i2c_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id brcmstb_i2c_of_match[] = {
>> + {.compatible = "brcm,brcmstb-i2c"},
>> + {},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, brcmstb_i2c_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver brcmstb_i2c_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "brcmstb-i2c",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .of_match_table = brcmstb_i2c_of_match,
>> + .pm = &brcmstb_i2c_pm,
>> + },
>> + .probe = brcmstb_i2c_probe,
>> + .remove = brcmstb_i2c_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(brcmstb_i2c_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kamal Dasu <kdasu-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Broadcom Settop I2C Driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> --
>> 2.3.2
Thanks,
Ray
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-02 20:01 [V2 1/2] i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver Kamal Dasu
[not found] ` <1428004866-13543-1-git-send-email-kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-02 20:01 ` [V2 2/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add i2c-brcmstb dt bindings Kamal Dasu
2015-04-14 13:47 ` [V2 1/2] i2c: brcmstb: Add Broadcom settop SoC i2c controller driver Wolfram Sang
2015-04-14 20:39 ` Ray Jui [this message]
[not found] ` <552D7AF5.7040005-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 7:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-15 7:51 ` Ray Jui
2015-04-16 15:32 ` Kamal Dasu
2015-04-15 7:21 ` rajeev kumar
[not found] ` <CAA7nrtjWUZOBQiTr0YrZFmLOoAttyJ5gMxb+hR7jnz1HC51Buw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-15 7:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-16 16:10 ` Kamal Dasu
[not found] ` <CAC=U0a3OXKBSUeRnbsXZ2J7snhRzhGAFctvzjwg=o90w59oNHg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-17 5:52 ` rajeev kumar
[not found] ` <CAA7nrtjyVXkMYTL8AWMMp1peZ0TGMwYtYhRxrTrBH3kyZzi1tw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-17 6:56 ` rajeev kumar
2015-04-17 17:12 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552D7AF5.7040005@broadcom.com \
--to=rjui-dy08kvg/lbpwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=f.fainelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregory.0xf0-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kdasu.kdev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.