All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: demos <demos@posteo.de>
To: openwrt-hackers@openwrt.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Connecting
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 23:03:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552D808F.1080900@posteo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552D79AE.3070509@gnunet.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1563 bytes --]

Connecting GNUnet with Openwrt
Is this the right place to forward this email?
Kind regards
Demos


-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: [GNUnet-developers] EDN
Datum: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 22:33:50 +0200
Von: Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org>
An: demos <demos@posteo.de>, gnunet-developers@gnu.org

On 04/14/15 21:55, demos wrote:
> Concerning the support of openwrt:
> What do you think about the idea of crosschecking certain parts of code
> for bugs (those parts that directly interact with one another?) together
> with the Openwrt-developers. (I haven't asked them yet. Maybe it's
> better if you ask them directly?)

Well, our code largely just calls the TUN/TAP APIs of the Kernel right
now, so I don't know where we'd there touch with OpenWRT-logic.

> In my opinion this would be a win-win situation for both,
> because you both have experienced C developers.
> They get their code reviewed, you get your code reviewed.

I'm not sure this is terribly realistic: it takes quite some time to be
familiar with the codebase (and you can't review code without
understanding what it is supposed to do).  That knowledge doesn't
translate to a different project easily, you have the initial steep
learning curve each time.  So it doesn't quite sound like a win-win.

However, if the OpenWRT folks are interested in helping Bart (& Florian)
get GNUnet onto the WRT platform, that would be great and might be an
actual win-win (we gain a platform, they a capability).


Happy hacking!

Christian




[-- Attachment #1.2: 0xBF83D308.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 4814 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

           reply	other threads:[~2015-04-14 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <552D79AE.3070509@gnunet.org>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552D808F.1080900@posteo.de \
    --to=demos@posteo.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openwrt-hackers@openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.