From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: parallel, real time safe waiting? Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:52:17 +0200 Message-ID: <552E18B1.60102@ladisch.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from dehamd003.servertools24.de (dehamd003.servertools24.de [31.47.254.18]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F9F2605D2 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:52:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Johannes Lorenz , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Johannes Lorenz wrote: > You said snd_pcm_wait() was real time safe. I guess that's also true > for similar functions, like snd_pcm_htimestamp(), snd_pcm_readi(), ..., > correct? Yes for all devices I know, but plugins might implement this differently. (But there's nothing you could do about it, so don't bother worrying.) Regards, Clemens