On 04/15/2015 04:56 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 08:36:20AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
>> Bikeshedding: I think this would be better suited to inode_dio_begin()
>> and inode_dio_end() because now we are trying to say "this is where
>> the DIO starts, and this is where it ends". It's not really
>> "reference counting" interface, we're trying to annotate the
>> boundaries of where DIO iis protected against truncate....
>
> *nod*
>
> And while we are at, inode_dio_begin() could be static inline just fine.

Done (rename and docbook), and inode_dio_{begin.end}() made static inlines.

v3 against vfs-next attached.

-- 
Jens Axboe