From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id EFAE2E00997; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:08:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com (mail-pd0-f178.google.com [209.85.192.178]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA93E00949 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pdea3 with SMTP id a3so68832276pde.3 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:08:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ikFVr8zE4yR4clmsykDA47W9wtLK2FL8El1/3Wwb0o4=; b=h+rSqOKyBq4pPT5lrdaA9KKmhNUe1Em+1WvxsbUyNl7ZcOhnUX0RmGmlHR6nXPTk9S qi9cijq8JKvxIBxi6/+gT6h6NqDtk6LfWWxsO3Cnt1AQ1kTc48SHw89/E8ZBE6BQyVbx vAdqPH6f36xvjrU+Uv35B7+uaXntqLbC/iPgs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ikFVr8zE4yR4clmsykDA47W9wtLK2FL8El1/3Wwb0o4=; b=QUgnIsbzCMCYmSgkZv9bypnNc9+FCCrW0fwhorC57WkNE7F7CCA2HzXo46yywV13Ia cZ/pJTne8PzO5iDmxe3qjEHlcLLxiiyhT18cx7NnmZmwReODTFN4oL6l9eDXiADzIyCS cA1OH3YMQh6cDACXOkIq05cMczpIKifJK2/NiZb0M0siIcjnUiyCJRNtJ2kiIDhBJRe6 i9UGbXVZWwlqtIrAd+0O9pOpQgRJpP46cLXbIFI7WlsHGtVfepyYDWrblJPBmNW6K5YH 6ZVmA7JKUeAz+fBrWoIC1S5opOaGapLGr9NDMGVcQt4J5K+qncCn/KTru2rcLNX+VQx5 qcYg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFLvyRly+U0Vtdmj97bkIw53RRC61GzD4Jf6dSKZomC94O76R4voG3O7RbyagKsURUaNpN X-Received: by 10.68.97.2 with SMTP id dw2mr50686740pbb.89.1429139283336; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.17.102] (static-50-43-13-43.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.43.13.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm5117863pdg.87.2015.04.15.16.08.01 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Michael Halstead Message-ID: <552EEF51.40703@yoctoproject.org> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 16:08:01 -0700 From: Michael Halstead User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto Project Discussion OpenPGP: id=D1F2407285E571ED12A407A73373170601861969 Subject: adtrepo clean-up X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:08:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit After examining download logs it appears we could safely delete versions 1.0-1.3.x from http://adtrepo.yoctoproject.org/. They are only accessed by web crawlers at this point. Removing them would make room for more releases and save on hardware budget. Are there any reasons to keep versions 1.0-1.3.x in http://adtrepo.yoctoproject.org/? -- Michael Halstead Yocto Project / SysAdmin