From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/6] xen: use ticket locks for spin locks Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:46:44 +0100 Message-ID: <552FAF34.5060200@citrix.com> References: <1428675597-28465-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <1428675597-28465-6-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <20150416120347.GJ13443@deinos.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YijCB-0002HX-1L for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:47:03 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20150416120347.GJ13443@deinos.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tim Deegan Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Jan Beulich , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 16/04/15 13:03, Tim Deegan wrote: > > Should there be a follow-up patch that removes all the arch-specific > raw_spinlock_t stuff? Or is it still in use somewhere else? This is patch #6. David