From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: CephFS and the next giant release v0.87.2 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 01:16:53 +0200 Message-ID: <553042E5.4040501@dachary.org> References: <552E316D.5060703@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nq66rR0O5Uk7XgiH0fs8Wlh58ojhkwlow" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:47931 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752546AbbDPXQ4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2015 19:16:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nq66rR0O5Uk7XgiH0fs8Wlh58ojhkwlow Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Greg, On 17/04/2015 00:44, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:= >> Hi Greg, >> >> The next giant release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/g= iant passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#fs). Do yo= u think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> Note that it will be the last giant release. >> >> Cheers >> >> P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#Release-information has dire= ct links to the pull requests merged into giant since v0.87.1 in case you= need more context about one of them. >=20 > All those PRs look like fine ones to release. >=20 > I remember you went through a big purge of giant-tagged backports at > one point though (when we thought we weren't going to do any more > releases at all). Did that get somehow undone and all of those dealt > with?=20 I inadvertendly closed a few issue that I should not have (less than 10 m= ore than 5 IIRC). I carefully reviewed all of them and they have been dea= lt with indeed. There now is a HOWTO to prevent that kind of mistake, hop= efully. http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO_resolve= _issues_that_are_Pending_Backport > Some of them were more important than others and it would be > some work for me to reconstruct the list, but I'll need to do that if > you haven't already. :/ There are a four giant issues that are candidate for backporting : http:/= /tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=3D68, only one of which i= s related to CephFS. Do you think it must be included in this last giant = release ? Cheers > -Greg >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --nq66rR0O5Uk7XgiH0fs8Wlh58ojhkwlow Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlUwQuYACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23ZwQCbBLXJ88HVT57OddewFqla9gAr nhcAoJX1gzB8Kts3Bd7gBh9IwGzfjisf =FAuz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nq66rR0O5Uk7XgiH0fs8Wlh58ojhkwlow--