From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] xen: arm: Annotate handlers for PCTR_EL2.Tx Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 07:31:28 +0100 Message-ID: <5530A8C0.3050507@citrix.com> References: <1427796446.2115.34.camel@citrix.com> <1427796462-24376-11-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <55226B93.6030906@citrix.com> <1429203215.25195.195.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1429203215.25195.195.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Julien Grall Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, julien.grall@linaro.org, tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Ian, On 16/04/2015 17:53, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 13:18 +0200, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> Subject: s/PCTR/CPTR/ >> >> On 31/03/2015 12:07, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell >>> --- >>> xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c >>> index 9cdbda8..ba120e5 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c >>> @@ -1704,6 +1704,11 @@ static void do_cp15_32(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, >>> * ARMv7 (DDI 0406C.b): B1.14.3 >>> * ARMv8 (DDI 0487A.d): D1-1501 Table D1-43 >>> * >>> + * CPTR_EL2.T{0..9,12..13} >>> + * >>> + * ARMv7 (DDI 0406C.b): B1.14.12 >>> + * ARMv8 (DDI 0487A.d): N/A >> >> I would also update the comment on top of WRITE_SYSREG(..., CPTR_EL2) to >> make clear that CP0..CP9 & CP12..CP13 are only traps for ARMv7. > > On v8 the corresponding bits are RES1, i.e. they always trap. I wrote: Somehow I read RES0 in the spec. > > /* Trap all coprocessor registers (0-13) except cp10 and > * cp11 for VFP. > * > * /!\ All coprocessors except cp10 and cp11 cannot be used in Xen. > * > * On ARM64 the TCPx bits which we set here (0..9,12,13) are all > * RES1, i.e. they would trap whether we did this write or not. > */ I'm fine with this change. Regards, -- Julien Grall