From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 8CE86E009CA; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:10:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_FROM_12LTRDOM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 T_FROM_12LTRDOM From a 12-letter domain X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:10:03 PDT Received: from sip2-98.nexcess.net (iwavesystems.com [207.32.180.10]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FB1E009C2 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 06:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 29143 invoked by uid 108); 17 Apr 2015 09:03:21 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.104?) (124.124.219.230) by sip2-98.nexcess.net with SMTP; 17 Apr 2015 09:03:21 -0400 Message-ID: <55310495.1050005@iwavesystems.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:33:17 +0530 From: ansaris User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: iMX6 - CPU frequency lowered during LDO bypass setting X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:10:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We are using imx6Q sabresd platform for our development with Linux 3.14.28_1.0.0-GA BSP but initially we used Linux 3.10.17_1.0.0-GA BSP. We have gone through below files from Linux 3.14.28_1.0.0-GA(File-1) and Linux 3.10.17_1.0.0-GA (FIle-2) BSPs. File-1: ~/u-boot-imx/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c File-2: ~/u-boot-imx/board/freescale/mx6qsabresd/mx6qsabresd.c We could see some changes are added in File-1(compare to File-2). In below function, we understood that the CPU frequency is lowered to 400Mhz before doing the LDO bypass and CPU frequency is increased to 800Mhz after the LDO bypass settings. "ldo_mode_set" In FIle-2 (Linux 3.10.17_1.0.0-GA), the below function will do the LDO bypass settings without changing the CPU frequency. "ldo_mode_set" We would like to know, during the LDO bypass settings why the CPU frequency is lowered in File-1(Linux 3.14.28_1.0.0-GA)? Is it recommended to do the same.? Thank You, Regards, Ansari