From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:03:40 +0300
Subject: [U-Boot] CONFIG_SPL vs CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5DXtN9FMuN2JtiaO32Xmq+1JHqixhFxN-jt6ynVY2wZZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5531394B.8030803@mail.bg>
 <CAOMZO5DXtN9FMuN2JtiaO32Xmq+1JHqixhFxN-jt6ynVY2wZZA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55313CEC.5070008@mail.bg>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Fabio,

On 04/17/2015 07:50 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Nikolay,
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmaster@mail.bg> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Why is required to add "SPL" to CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS, when we have
>> also CONFIG_SPL? I found the following mx6 boards are doing it:
>>
>> configs/mx6sabresd_spl_defconfig
>
> Yes, not needed. I will remove it.
>
>> configs/cm_fx6_defconfig
>> configs/mx6cuboxi_spl_defconfig
>
> I remove the 'SPL' in v2.

Sorry if you felt like this, but I wasn't pointing at you specifically.

I'm just not sure what's the proper way to configure SPL support these
days, after so many updates to the SPL code & Kconfig migration.

Regards,
Nikolay