From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] drm/i915: Removed now redudant parameter to i915_gem_request_completed()
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:57:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55315791.6070904@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426873717-10176-3-git-send-email-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On 20/03/15 17:48, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> The change to the implementation of i915_gem_request_completed() means that the
> lazy coherency flag is no longer used. This can now be removed to simplify the
> interface.
>
> For: VIZ-5190
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 14 +++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Just to bring this up to date, there are three more instances that have
appeared since this patch was written; here are the additional changes:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 4dd8b41..f4ba6fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6801,7 +6801,7 @@ static void __intel_rps_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct request_boost *boost = container_of(work, struct request_boost, work);
>
> - if (!i915_gem_request_completed(boost->rq, true))
> + if (!i915_gem_request_completed(boost->rq))
> gen6_rps_boost(to_i915(boost->rq->ring->dev), NULL);
>
> i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(boost->rq);
> dsgordon@dsgordon-linux:/usr2/dsgordon/Source/JH-OTC-DRM/OTC-DRM$ git diff drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 7c97005..9d6b8bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ static int __i915_spin_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>
> timeout = jiffies + 1;
> while (!need_resched()) {
> - if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq, true))
> + if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq))
> return 0;
>
> if (time_after_eq(jiffies, timeout))
> @@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static int __i915_spin_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>
> cpu_relax_lowlatency();
> }
> - if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq, false))
> + if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq))
> return 0;
>
> return -EAGAIN;
.Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-17 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-20 17:48 [RFC 0/4] Convert requests to use struct fence John.C.Harrison
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 1/4] drm/i915: " John.C.Harrison
2015-04-07 9:18 ` [RFC, " Maarten Lankhorst
2015-04-07 10:59 ` John Harrison
2015-04-07 11:18 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-04-17 19:22 ` Dave Gordon
2015-04-20 5:13 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 2/4] drm/i915: Removed now redudant parameter to i915_gem_request_completed() John.C.Harrison
2015-04-17 18:57 ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 3/4] drm/i915: Interrupt driven fences John.C.Harrison
2015-03-20 21:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-23 9:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-23 12:13 ` John Harrison
2015-03-26 13:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-26 17:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2015-03-27 8:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Updated request structure tracing John.C.Harrison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55315791.6070904@intel.com \
--to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.