All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Johnson <ukfreebies@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using latest e2fsprogs on various offline VM ext filesystems
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 21:30:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5532BEF6.5010801@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A8589FB6-80B3-418C-9540-F9AA75FFCF72@dilger.ca>

Great, thanks Andreas for confirming that, and for the snapshot tip.
Dan

On 18/04/15 16:12, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> You can safely use newer e2fsprogs on older file systems. This should not
> affect compatibility with older kernels in any way, unless you explicitly
> enable features.
>
> Note that if you are using LVM/DM you could create a snapshot of the
> running device and run e2fsck on that. If no errors are found then you
> don't need to stop the VM at all. You can reset the last checked counter
> and mount count via tune2fs. Only if you find an error in the snapshot do
> you need to unmount the filesystem to fix it.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
>> On Apr 18, 2015, at 06:46, Daniel Johnson <dan.u.johns@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Apologies if this "user" question has been asked before.
>>
>> Tomorrow I will be stopping a couple of dozen kvm virtual machines
>> running various Linux distros and running a forced e2fsck on all of
>> their ext filesystems. The distros are a mix of various flavours of
>> Ubuntu, Debian and Centos, so will include some fs created with older
>> kernels and E2fsprogs.
>>
>> The host is 64-bit Centos 6 running vanilla kernel 3.14.39. I figured
>> I'll build the latest E2fsprogs 1.42.12 for this rather than using the
>> Centos 6 e2fsprogs-1.41.12-21.el6.x86_64.
>>
>> My question is; should it be safe in theory to use the latest
>> E2fsprogs on a mix of ext filesystems in this way? I would have
>> thought so but don't want to rely on any assumptions :-)
>>
>> I'll be setting up device maps on the host server to get to the
>> filesystems on each VMs virtual disk, and doing read only checks. But
>> if anything needs a repair then I could potentially have a fs modified
>> on newer kernel & userspace that then has to boot inside a VM with a
>> distro with much older kernel and userspace such as Centos 5, which is
>> what I'm concerned about.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan

      reply	other threads:[~2015-04-18 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-18 12:46 Using latest e2fsprogs on various offline VM ext filesystems Daniel Johnson
2015-04-18 15:12 ` Andreas Dilger
2015-04-18 20:30   ` Daniel Johnson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5532BEF6.5010801@gmail.com \
    --to=ukfreebies@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=dan.u.johns@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.