From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: Re: [RFC] bind/unbind SoC devices with deferred list Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:06:32 +0200 Message-ID: <55378EC8.2020509@metafoo.de> References: <87383sh7i6.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp-out-173.synserver.de (smtp-out-173.synserver.de [212.40.185.173]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0D826057F for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:06:28 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai , Kuninori Morimoto Cc: Linux-ALSA , Mark Brown List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On 04/22/2015 02:02 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:51:21 +0000, > Kuninori Morimoto wrote: >> >> >> Hi Takashi, Mark, Lars >> >> I worked for bind/unbind issue which was discussed before >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/134062/focus=134076 >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.alsa.devel/134283/focus=134287 >> >> I would like to know your opinion before sending patch to Greg >> >> The problem is ASoC has card/platform/cpu/codec relationship for each other, >> but, we can unbind one of them, and then, other related devices doesn't know >> about it. Thus, kernel will error if we use sound after that. > > Wouldn't the standard component (linux/component.h) be able to solve > such a problem? At least that is the idea. The long term plan for ASoC is to switch over to the component framework. - Lars