From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks
 on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:43:31 +0100
Message-ID: <5537C1A3.8000302@citrix.com>
References: <1428940983-8709-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<21803.61424.207722.792094@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<552BF0B0.90708@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <552BF0B0.90708@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, security@xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Ping on the patches themselves?

On 13/04/15 17:37, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 13/04/15 17:33, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Andrew Cooper writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125"):
>>> gcc 4.1 of CentOS 5.x era does not like the typecheck in min() between
>>> uint64_t and unsigned long.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>>> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
>>> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>> As and when this is acked and pushed to #staging, we should update the
>> advisory.
>>
>>> This needs backporting to 4.5
>> To be clear, do you know whether this is a trivial cherry pick ?
> It is trivial to cherrypick.
>
> 4.4 is the problematic case which I did the backport for separately, but
> then that is trivial to cherrypick back to 4.2
>
> ~Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel