All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Abuse of CONFIG_FOO's as feature selectors
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:20:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5537E665.3010800@redhat.com> (raw)

Hi,

Kernel has a growing number of CONFIG items which are not
user-selectable features of their particular kernel builds,
but simply booleans controlled by other CONFIGs.
Example:

config X86
        def_bool y
        select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
        select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
        select ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER
        select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
        select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
        select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
        select HAVE_AOUT if X86_32
        select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
        select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING if X86_64
        select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if X86_64
        select HAVE_IDE
        select HAVE_OPROFILE
        ...

I see how this practice originated: "select" statement
was initially added so that if feature X requires feature Y,
this can be enforced, but it was easy to use it to define
other booleans.

I have a feeling that in retrospect, it was a mistake.

It clutters .config with information which has nothing to do
with user's choice.

More importantly, now when you read some code, you don't know
whether a CONFIG_FOO you look at is user's configuration choice
or something else.

Now there are hundreds, maybe even thousands of these non-config
CONFIGs everywhere.


The same effect can be achieved, with marginally more typing,
with usual C defines in some header file:

#ifdef CONFIG_X86
# define ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS
# define ARCH_HAS_FAST_MULTIPLIER
# define ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
# define ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
# define ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
...

Maybe we should stop doing the former and use the latter method?

             reply	other threads:[~2015-04-22 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-22 18:20 Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2015-04-22 18:56 ` Abuse of CONFIG_FOO's as feature selectors Andreas Ruprecht
2015-04-23 12:11   ` Stefan Hengelein
2015-04-23 19:28 ` Paul Bolle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5537E665.3010800@redhat.com \
    --to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.