All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <5538C6C2.5010508@linaro.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 2e24864..d2a8ae1 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ On 04/23/2015 03:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
 >> "Also, it is recommended that the alarm registers be loaded
 >> before the alarm is enabled."
 >>
-> 
+>=20
 > Hmm... i did not know that existed, thanks for digging it up.. that
 > teaches me to look for docs before putting a scope/LA on the board
 > (not that I regret doing that)... That said, reading the app note, I
@@ -35,22 +35,22 @@ On 04/23/2015 03:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
 > then, that implies that oscillator will have to be restarted (upto a
 > few seconds for certain crystals).. but that said, it does not seem
 > mandatory or seem to (yet seen) functional issues...
-> 
+>=20
 > b) We dont have flexibility yet to describe if we do indeed have a
 > backup battery or not - VBATEN should be set only if we have a backup
 > battery on the platform :( - on some it might even be optional thanks
 > to certain compliance requirements of shipping boards internationally
 > and general "unlike" of lithium ion in cargo hold..
-> 
+>=20
 > c) we dont have capability to control the alarm polarity in the driver
 > which, by the way, we probably should also control OUT polarity (when
 > ALARM is not asserted)..
-> 
+>=20
 > d) we dont have support for external 32k oscillator(X1 only) instead
 > of assuming we always have a 32k crystal(X1 and X2)...
-> 
+>=20
 > Ugghhh... more cleaning up to do for the future..
-> 
+>=20
 > that said, the sequence it does recommend (in page 4):
 > The following steps show how the Alarm 0 is config-
 > ured. Alarm 1 can be configured in the same manner.
@@ -59,47 +59,47 @@ On 04/23/2015 03:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
 > 2.    Write 0x47 to the Alarm0 Minutes register
 > [0x0B].
 > 3.    Write 0x71 to the Alarm0 Hours register [0x0C]
-> – 11 hours in 12-hour format.
-> 4.    Write 0x72 to the Alarm0 Day register [0x0D] –
+> =E2=80=93 11 hours in 12-hour format.
+> 4.    Write 0x72 to the Alarm0 Day register [0x0D] =E2=80=93
 > Tuesday + Alarm Polarity Low + Match on all.
 > The Alarm0 Interrupt Flag is also cleared.
 > 5.    Write 0x14 to the Alarm0 Date register [0x0E].
 > 6.    Write 0x08 to the Alarm0 Month register [0x0F].
 > With all the Alarm0 registers set we can now activate
 > the Alarm0 on the Control register.
-> 7.    Write 0x10 to the Control register [0x07] –
+> 7.    Write 0x10 to the Control register [0x07] =E2=80=93
 > Alarm0 enabled no CLKOUT, Alarm1 disabled
-> 
+>=20
 > before this patch we do ( http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10863880/)
-> 	CONTROL r[7] = 0x90 (OUT=1, ALM0EN=1)
-> 	OSCTRIM r[8] = 0x00
-> 	EEUNLOCK r[9] = 0x00
-> 	ALM0SEC r[A] = 0x01
-> 	ALM0MIN r[B] = 0x45
-> 	ALM0HOUR r[C] = 0x23
-> 	ALM0WKDAY r[D] = 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared
-> 	ALM0DATE r[E] = 0x09
-> 	ALM0MTH r[F] = 0x04
-> 	RSRVED r[10] = 0x01
-> 
+> 	CONTROL r[7] =3D 0x90 (OUT=3D1, ALM0EN=3D1)
+> 	OSCTRIM r[8] =3D 0x00
+> 	EEUNLOCK r[9] =3D 0x00
+> 	ALM0SEC r[A] =3D 0x01
+> 	ALM0MIN r[B] =3D 0x45
+> 	ALM0HOUR r[C] =3D 0x23
+> 	ALM0WKDAY r[D] =3D 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared
+> 	ALM0DATE r[E] =3D 0x09
+> 	ALM0MTH r[F] =3D 0x04
+> 	RSRVED r[10] =3D 0x01
+>=20
 > with this patch, we do:
-> burst(	CONTROL r[7] = 0x80 (OUT=1)
-> 	OSCTRIM r[8] = 0x00
-> 	EEUNLOCK r[9] = 0x00
-> 	ALM0SEC r[A] = 0x01
-> 	ALM0MIN r[B] = 0x45
-> 	ALM0HOUR r[C] = 0x23
-> 	ALM0WKDAY r[D] = 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared
-> 	ALM0DATE r[E] = 0x09
-> 	ALM0MTH r[F] = 0x04
-> 	RSRVED r[10] = 0x01
+> burst(	CONTROL r[7] =3D 0x80 (OUT=3D1)
+> 	OSCTRIM r[8] =3D 0x00
+> 	EEUNLOCK r[9] =3D 0x00
+> 	ALM0SEC r[A] =3D 0x01
+> 	ALM0MIN r[B] =3D 0x45
+> 	ALM0HOUR r[C] =3D 0x23
+> 	ALM0WKDAY r[D] =3D 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared
+> 	ALM0DATE r[E] =3D 0x09
+> 	ALM0MTH r[F] =3D 0x04
+> 	RSRVED r[10] =3D 0x01
 > )
-> 	CONTROL r[7] = 0x90 (OUT=1, ALM0EN=1)
-> 
+> 	CONTROL r[7] =3D 0x90 (OUT=3D1, ALM0EN=3D1)
+>=20
 > Which is slightly unoptimal way of what the app note recommends. - as
 > I mentioned earlier in this thread, I will try and do optimizations in
 > a later patch.
-> 
+>=20
 > Given that Andrew had picked up this patch, I dont see a reason to
 > respin this yet. but will include the app note for future patches -
 > thanks for pointing it out to me.
@@ -122,27 +122,31 @@ On 04/23/2015 03:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
 >>> index 4ffabb322a9a..3cd4783375a5 100644
 >>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
 >>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c
->>> @@ -742,17 +742,17 @@ static int mcp794xx_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
->>>    	regs[6] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALMX_IF;
+>>> @@ -742,17 +742,17 @@ static int mcp794xx_set_alarm(struct device *dev,=
+ struct rtc_wkalrm *t)
+>>>    	regs[6] &=3D ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALMX_IF;
 >>>    	/* Set alarm match: second, minute, hour, day, date, month. */
->>>    	regs[6] |= MCP794XX_MSK_ALMX_MATCH;
+>>>    	regs[6] |=3D MCP794XX_MSK_ALMX_MATCH;
 >>> -
 >>> -	if (t->enabled)
->>> -		regs[0] |= MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+>>> -		regs[0] |=3D MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
 >>> -	else
->>> -		regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
->>> +	/* Disable interrupt. We will not enable until completely programmed */
->>> +	regs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
->>>    
->>>    	ret = ds1307->write_block_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, 10, regs);
+>>> -		regs[0] &=3D ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+>>> +	/* Disable interrupt. We will not enable until completely programmed =
+*/
+>>> +	regs[0] &=3D ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+>>>   =20
+>>>    	ret =3D ds1307->write_block_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, 10, =
+regs);
 >>>    	if (ret < 0)
 >>>    		return ret;
->>>    
+>>>   =20
 >>> -	return 0;
 >>> +	if (!t->enabled)
 >>> +		return 0;
->>> +	regs[0] |= MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
->>> +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, regs[0]);
+>>> +	regs[0] |=3D MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;
+>>> +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, regs[0=
+]);
 >>
 >> So, It seems, that right sequence should be:
 >> - disable alarmX
@@ -155,25 +159,37 @@ On 04/23/2015 03:00 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
 > performed. probably just a couple of reads might be
 > sufficient..(ALM0WKDAY has some control bits as well.. Ugggh..
 > anyways..)...
-> 
-> 
+>=20
+>=20
 > Will have to think more about optimizing more later.
 
 
-Also I've done some fast investigation and I found that ~half of RTC drivers disable
- ALM IRQ before start accessing Alarm regs (twl-rtc.c)  while another half don't do that :)
+Also I've done some fast investigation and I found that ~half of RTC driver=
+s disable
+ ALM IRQ before start accessing Alarm regs (twl-rtc.c)  while another half =
+don't do that :)
 (just FYI)
 
-> 
+>=20
 >>
->> More over, looks like, alarm/alarm IRQ should be enabled/disabled separately from set_alarm/RTC_ALM_SET
+>> More over, looks like, alarm/alarm IRQ should be enabled/disabled separa=
+tely from set_alarm/RTC_ALM_SET
 >> by RTC_AIE_ON, RTC_AIE_OFF. Should it?
-> 
+>=20
 
--- 
+--=20
 regards,
 -grygorii
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
-the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+
+--=20
+--=20
+You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
+Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
+Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
+before submitting a driver.
+---=20
+You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
+rtc-linux" group.
+To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
+mail to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
+For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index dda4b2e..7335413 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  "ref\05537A169.206@linaro.org\0"
  "ref\055383625.3070108@ti.com\0"
  "From\0Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH V2] drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c: Enable the mcp794xx alarm after programming time\0"
+ "Subject\0[rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH V2] drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c: Enable the mcp794xx alarm after programming time\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:17:38 +0300\0"
  "To\0Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>"
   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
  ">> \"Also, it is recommended that the alarm registers be loaded\n"
  ">> before the alarm is enabled.\"\n"
  ">>\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Hmm... i did not know that existed, thanks for digging it up.. that\n"
  "> teaches me to look for docs before putting a scope/LA on the board\n"
  "> (not that I regret doing that)... That said, reading the app note, I\n"
@@ -49,22 +49,22 @@
  "> then, that implies that oscillator will have to be restarted (upto a\n"
  "> few seconds for certain crystals).. but that said, it does not seem\n"
  "> mandatory or seem to (yet seen) functional issues...\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> b) We dont have flexibility yet to describe if we do indeed have a\n"
  "> backup battery or not - VBATEN should be set only if we have a backup\n"
  "> battery on the platform :( - on some it might even be optional thanks\n"
  "> to certain compliance requirements of shipping boards internationally\n"
  "> and general \"unlike\" of lithium ion in cargo hold..\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> c) we dont have capability to control the alarm polarity in the driver\n"
  "> which, by the way, we probably should also control OUT polarity (when\n"
  "> ALARM is not asserted)..\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> d) we dont have support for external 32k oscillator(X1 only) instead\n"
  "> of assuming we always have a 32k crystal(X1 and X2)...\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Ugghhh... more cleaning up to do for the future..\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> that said, the sequence it does recommend (in page 4):\n"
  "> The following steps show how the Alarm 0 is config-\n"
  "> ured. Alarm 1 can be configured in the same manner.\n"
@@ -73,47 +73,47 @@
  "> 2.    Write 0x47 to the Alarm0 Minutes register\n"
  "> [0x0B].\n"
  "> 3.    Write 0x71 to the Alarm0 Hours register [0x0C]\n"
- "> \342\200\223 11 hours in 12-hour format.\n"
- "> 4.    Write 0x72 to the Alarm0 Day register [0x0D] \342\200\223\n"
+ "> =E2=80=93 11 hours in 12-hour format.\n"
+ "> 4.    Write 0x72 to the Alarm0 Day register [0x0D] =E2=80=93\n"
  "> Tuesday + Alarm Polarity Low + Match on all.\n"
  "> The Alarm0 Interrupt Flag is also cleared.\n"
  "> 5.    Write 0x14 to the Alarm0 Date register [0x0E].\n"
  "> 6.    Write 0x08 to the Alarm0 Month register [0x0F].\n"
  "> With all the Alarm0 registers set we can now activate\n"
  "> the Alarm0 on the Control register.\n"
- "> 7.    Write 0x10 to the Control register [0x07] \342\200\223\n"
+ "> 7.    Write 0x10 to the Control register [0x07] =E2=80=93\n"
  "> Alarm0 enabled no CLKOUT, Alarm1 disabled\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> before this patch we do ( http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10863880/)\n"
- "> \tCONTROL r[7] = 0x90 (OUT=1, ALM0EN=1)\n"
- "> \tOSCTRIM r[8] = 0x00\n"
- "> \tEEUNLOCK r[9] = 0x00\n"
- "> \tALM0SEC r[A] = 0x01\n"
- "> \tALM0MIN r[B] = 0x45\n"
- "> \tALM0HOUR r[C] = 0x23\n"
- "> \tALM0WKDAY r[D] = 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared\n"
- "> \tALM0DATE r[E] = 0x09\n"
- "> \tALM0MTH r[F] = 0x04\n"
- "> \tRSRVED r[10] = 0x01\n"
- "> \n"
+ "> \tCONTROL r[7] =3D 0x90 (OUT=3D1, ALM0EN=3D1)\n"
+ "> \tOSCTRIM r[8] =3D 0x00\n"
+ "> \tEEUNLOCK r[9] =3D 0x00\n"
+ "> \tALM0SEC r[A] =3D 0x01\n"
+ "> \tALM0MIN r[B] =3D 0x45\n"
+ "> \tALM0HOUR r[C] =3D 0x23\n"
+ "> \tALM0WKDAY r[D] =3D 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared\n"
+ "> \tALM0DATE r[E] =3D 0x09\n"
+ "> \tALM0MTH r[F] =3D 0x04\n"
+ "> \tRSRVED r[10] =3D 0x01\n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> with this patch, we do:\n"
- "> burst(\tCONTROL r[7] = 0x80 (OUT=1)\n"
- "> \tOSCTRIM r[8] = 0x00\n"
- "> \tEEUNLOCK r[9] = 0x00\n"
- "> \tALM0SEC r[A] = 0x01\n"
- "> \tALM0MIN r[B] = 0x45\n"
- "> \tALM0HOUR r[C] = 0x23\n"
- "> \tALM0WKDAY r[D] = 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared\n"
- "> \tALM0DATE r[E] = 0x09\n"
- "> \tALM0MTH r[F] = 0x04\n"
- "> \tRSRVED r[10] = 0x01\n"
+ "> burst(\tCONTROL r[7] =3D 0x80 (OUT=3D1)\n"
+ "> \tOSCTRIM r[8] =3D 0x00\n"
+ "> \tEEUNLOCK r[9] =3D 0x00\n"
+ "> \tALM0SEC r[A] =3D 0x01\n"
+ "> \tALM0MIN r[B] =3D 0x45\n"
+ "> \tALM0HOUR r[C] =3D 0x23\n"
+ "> \tALM0WKDAY r[D] =3D 0x75 <-ALMOIF is cleared\n"
+ "> \tALM0DATE r[E] =3D 0x09\n"
+ "> \tALM0MTH r[F] =3D 0x04\n"
+ "> \tRSRVED r[10] =3D 0x01\n"
  "> )\n"
- "> \tCONTROL r[7] = 0x90 (OUT=1, ALM0EN=1)\n"
- "> \n"
+ "> \tCONTROL r[7] =3D 0x90 (OUT=3D1, ALM0EN=3D1)\n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Which is slightly unoptimal way of what the app note recommends. - as\n"
  "> I mentioned earlier in this thread, I will try and do optimizations in\n"
  "> a later patch.\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Given that Andrew had picked up this patch, I dont see a reason to\n"
  "> respin this yet. but will include the app note for future patches -\n"
  "> thanks for pointing it out to me.\n"
@@ -136,27 +136,31 @@
  ">>> index 4ffabb322a9a..3cd4783375a5 100644\n"
  ">>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c\n"
  ">>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c\n"
- ">>> @@ -742,17 +742,17 @@ static int mcp794xx_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t)\n"
- ">>>    \tregs[6] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALMX_IF;\n"
+ ">>> @@ -742,17 +742,17 @@ static int mcp794xx_set_alarm(struct device *dev,=\n"
+ " struct rtc_wkalrm *t)\n"
+ ">>>    \tregs[6] &=3D ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALMX_IF;\n"
  ">>>    \t/* Set alarm match: second, minute, hour, day, date, month. */\n"
- ">>>    \tregs[6] |= MCP794XX_MSK_ALMX_MATCH;\n"
+ ">>>    \tregs[6] |=3D MCP794XX_MSK_ALMX_MATCH;\n"
  ">>> -\n"
  ">>> -\tif (t->enabled)\n"
- ">>> -\t\tregs[0] |= MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
+ ">>> -\t\tregs[0] |=3D MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
  ">>> -\telse\n"
- ">>> -\t\tregs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
- ">>> +\t/* Disable interrupt. We will not enable until completely programmed */\n"
- ">>> +\tregs[0] &= ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
- ">>>    \n"
- ">>>    \tret = ds1307->write_block_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, 10, regs);\n"
+ ">>> -\t\tregs[0] &=3D ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
+ ">>> +\t/* Disable interrupt. We will not enable until completely programmed =\n"
+ "*/\n"
+ ">>> +\tregs[0] &=3D ~MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
+ ">>>   =20\n"
+ ">>>    \tret =3D ds1307->write_block_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, 10, =\n"
+ "regs);\n"
  ">>>    \tif (ret < 0)\n"
  ">>>    \t\treturn ret;\n"
- ">>>    \n"
+ ">>>   =20\n"
  ">>> -\treturn 0;\n"
  ">>> +\tif (!t->enabled)\n"
  ">>> +\t\treturn 0;\n"
- ">>> +\tregs[0] |= MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
- ">>> +\treturn i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, regs[0]);\n"
+ ">>> +\tregs[0] |=3D MCP794XX_BIT_ALM0_EN;\n"
+ ">>> +\treturn i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MCP794XX_REG_CONTROL, regs[0=\n"
+ "]);\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> So, It seems, that right sequence should be:\n"
  ">> - disable alarmX\n"
@@ -169,27 +173,39 @@
  "> performed. probably just a couple of reads might be\n"
  "> sufficient..(ALM0WKDAY has some control bits as well.. Ugggh..\n"
  "> anyways..)...\n"
- "> \n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "> Will have to think more about optimizing more later.\n"
  "\n"
  "\n"
- "Also I've done some fast investigation and I found that ~half of RTC drivers disable\n"
- " ALM IRQ before start accessing Alarm regs (twl-rtc.c)  while another half don't do that :)\n"
+ "Also I've done some fast investigation and I found that ~half of RTC driver=\n"
+ "s disable\n"
+ " ALM IRQ before start accessing Alarm regs (twl-rtc.c)  while another half =\n"
+ "don't do that :)\n"
  "(just FYI)\n"
  "\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  ">>\n"
- ">> More over, looks like, alarm/alarm IRQ should be enabled/disabled separately from set_alarm/RTC_ALM_SET\n"
+ ">> More over, looks like, alarm/alarm IRQ should be enabled/disabled separa=\n"
+ "tely from set_alarm/RTC_ALM_SET\n"
  ">> by RTC_AIE_ON, RTC_AIE_OFF. Should it?\n"
- "> \n"
+ ">=20\n"
  "\n"
- "-- \n"
+ "--=20\n"
  "regards,\n"
  "-grygorii\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-omap\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ "\n"
+ "--=20\n"
+ "--=20\n"
+ "You received this message because you are subscribed to \"rtc-linux\".\n"
+ "Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .\n"
+ "Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist\n"
+ "before submitting a driver.\n"
+ "---=20\n"
+ "You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups \"=\n"
+ "rtc-linux\" group.\n"
+ "To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=\n"
+ "mail to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.\n"
+ For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 
-0721a2d955f49d57b1571f74bd2be9615ba788b3f3f110d723f530ebd05a5a9c
+04cd42180dbe488f34b8520efe44f2d892a0527a2f036333e80caec1169f1a93

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 2e24864..81d9f08 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -173,7 +173,3 @@ Also I've done some fast investigation and I found that ~half of RTC drivers dis
 -- 
 regards,
 -grygorii
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
-the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index dda4b2e..16465fd 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -186,10 +186,6 @@
  "\n"
  "-- \n"
  "regards,\n"
- "-grygorii\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-omap\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ -grygorii
 
-0721a2d955f49d57b1571f74bd2be9615ba788b3f3f110d723f530ebd05a5a9c
+58019fc62ea6c5b33b2623c7db1baf45404b3fc4cb0f07ab6a3ce768c8bfab78

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.