From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mdio-gpio: support access that may sleep
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:19:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553A6D2B.20901@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150424.120142.515098054679955418.davem@davemloft.net>
On 24/04/15 09:01, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:56:34 -0700
>
>> On 24/04/15 08:04, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:06:54 -0400
>>>
>>>> Some systems using mdio-gpio may use gpio on message based busses, which
>>>> require sleeping (e.g. gpio from an I2C I/O expander).
>>>>
>>>> Since this driver does not use IRQ handler, it is safe to use the
>>>> _cansleep suffixed gpio accessors.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
>>>
>>> Since this is down underneath the layer of an MII bus, you cannot
>>> universally say that these routines are always called in a sleepable
>>> context.
>>>
>>> The PHY layer, and the driver itself above that, might call these
>>> routines from timers, interruptes etc.
>>
>> The PHY library calls these routines from its state machine workqueue
>> for that reason, or from process context (when invoked via ethtool
>> ioctl). The only special case is phy_mac_interrupt() which is callable
>> from interrupt context, but schedules the state machine workqueue anyway
>> to circumvent the "in-interrupt" context.
>>
>> If we were not doing that, there would be a number of things broken, for
>> instance the per-MDIO bus mutex would not protect us from anything.
>
> Does the link state polling timer use a workqueue in this manner as
> well?
Yes, the state machine re-schedules its own delayed workqueue at the end
of its state processing, no timer/hrtimer is used.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 17:06 [PATCH] net: mdio-gpio: support access that may sleep Vivien Didelot
2015-04-24 15:04 ` David Miller
2015-04-24 15:56 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-24 16:01 ` David Miller
2015-04-24 16:19 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-04-24 16:25 ` David Miller
2015-04-24 17:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-04-24 17:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-24 17:42 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553A6D2B.20901@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.