From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Firefly integration branch : OK Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:21:08 +0200 Message-ID: <553E1BA4.7070604@dachary.org> References: <553DEDD3.2030202@dachary.org> <75674D092A819E4189E91166C74CB90D015333B1@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UvtRx61Dvqnq66oGGrDn1mRNdjjUNeNcX" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:53460 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965070AbbD0VsN (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:48:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <75674D092A819E4189E91166C74CB90D015333B1@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Shu, Xinxin" Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UvtRx61Dvqnq66oGGrDn1mRNdjjUNeNcX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 27/04/2015 11:19, Shu, Xinxin wrote: > Hi loic, can we merge PR (4414 ~ 4416) into integration branch now As soon as the pull requests 4385, 4384, 4382 are merged we can reset the= integration branch will all pending firefly pull requests and start anot= her round :-) Cheers > -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@vger.ke= rnel.org] On Behalf Of Loic Dachary > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 4:06 PM > To: Shu, Xinxin > Cc: Ceph Development > Subject: Firefly integration branch : OK >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I saw this morning the firefly integration branch passed rados and rbd = suites :-)=20 >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#rados > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#rbd >=20 > The issue has been updated accordingly. It means the following pull req= uests passed: >=20 > $ git log --merges --oneline 12143ff9b25fdd96f8d1a9cecb1329c7f354d414..= b91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79 > b91bbb4 Merge 4245: librbd: snap_remove should ignore -ENOENT errors 62= 45bed Merge 4206: librbd: acquire cache_lock before refreshing parent > ef08aa9 Merge 4185: FAILED assert(soid < scrubber.start || soid >=3D sc= rubber.end) ae1b18a Merge 3963: Rados.shutdown() dies with Illegal instru= ction (core dumped) 056db0f Merge 4385: osd: ENOENT on clone > e4b1fd1 Merge 4384: pg stuck stale after create with activation delay 5= 97124b Merge 4383: erasure-code-profile set races with erasure-code-profi= le rm > b7bbd43 Merge 4382: osd/PGLog.h: 279: FAILED assert(log.log.size() =3D=3D= log_keys_debug.size()) >=20 > Ouf ot these, three are backports ready to be reviewed by their origina= l authors: >=20 > 056db0f Merge 4385: osd: ENOENT on clone https://github.com/ceph/ceph/p= ull/4385 > e4b1fd1 Merge 4384: pg stuck stale after create with activation delay h= ttps://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4384 > b7bbd43 Merge 4382: osd/PGLog.h: 279: FAILED assert(log.log.size() =3D=3D= log_keys_debug.size()) >=20 > The simplest way would be to ask for their review with a comment in the= pull request, with a reference to the test suite results so they know it= passed the suites. Will you have time to do this today ? If you don't ha= ve time, just let me know and I'll do it for you. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > -- > Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >=20 > N=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDy=EF=BF= =BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDb=EF=BF=BDX=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=C7=A7v=EF=BF=BD^=EF=BF= =BD)=DE=BA{.n=EF=BF=BD+=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDz=EF=BF=BD]z=EF=BF=BD=EF= =BF=BD=EF=BF=BD{ay=EF=BF=BD=1D=CA=87=DA=99=EF=BF=BD,j=07=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD= f=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDh=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDz=EF=BF=BD=1E=EF=BF= =BDw=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=0C=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDj:+v=EF=BF=BD= =EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDw=EF=BF=BDj=EF=BF=BDm=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD= =07=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDzZ+=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF= =BD=EF=BF=BD=DD=A2j"=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD!tml=3D >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --UvtRx61Dvqnq66oGGrDn1mRNdjjUNeNcX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlU+G6QACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21chgCglC95yNJuoXTnAMxfMWMRbZQt KOgAnA1+R7E44FNVFPws4bjtMDp2aCPs =eWfj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UvtRx61Dvqnq66oGGrDn1mRNdjjUNeNcX--