All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Nelson <mnelson@redhat.com>
To: Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@odiso.com>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: async messenger small benchmark result
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:48:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <553F8FC3.5050502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1034248732.735373173.1430210204922.JavaMail.zimbra@oxygem.tv>

Hi Alex,

Thanks!  So far we've gotten a report that asyncmesseneger was a little 
slower than simple messenger, but not this bad!  I imagine Greg will 
have lots of questions. :)

Mark

On 04/28/2015 03:36 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here a small bench 4k randread of simple messenger vs async messenger
>
> This is with 2 osd, and 15 fio jobs on a single rbd volume
>
> simple messager : 345kiops
> async messenger : 139kiops
>
> Regards,
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>
>
> simple messenger
> ---------------
>
> ^Cbs: 15 (f=15): [r(15)] [0.0% done] [1346MB/0KB/0KB /s] [345K/0/0 iops] [eta 59d:13h:32m:43s]
> fio: terminating on signal 2
>
> rbd_iodepth32-test: (groupid=0, jobs=15): err= 0: pid=44713: Tue Apr 28 10:26:21 2015
>    read : io=15794MB, bw=1321.4MB/s, iops=338255, runt= 11953msec
>      slat (usec): min=5, max=17316, avg=33.81, stdev=63.77
>      clat (usec): min=4, max=60848, avg=1011.22, stdev=1026.16
>       lat (usec): min=110, max=60857, avg=1045.03, stdev=1031.56
>      clat percentiles (usec):
>       |  1.00th=[  219],  5.00th=[  298], 10.00th=[  362], 20.00th=[  466],
>       | 30.00th=[  572], 40.00th=[  676], 50.00th=[  796], 60.00th=[  940],
>       | 70.00th=[ 1112], 80.00th=[ 1336], 90.00th=[ 1784], 95.00th=[ 2288],
>       | 99.00th=[ 4128], 99.50th=[ 5536], 99.90th=[13376], 99.95th=[17536],
>       | 99.99th=[28544]
>      bw (KB  /s): min=31386, max=122224, per=6.67%, avg=90244.35, stdev=17571.24
>      lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=2.21%
>      lat (usec) : 500=21.02%, 750=22.82%, 1000=17.99%
>      lat (msec) : 2=28.62%, 4=6.26%, 10=0.88%, 20=0.15%, 50=0.03%
>      lat (msec) : 100=0.01%
>    cpu          : usr=36.30%, sys=10.85%, ctx=2323657, majf=0, minf=5736
>    IO depths    : 1=0.2%, 2=0.8%, 4=3.4%, 8=16.3%, 16=72.0%, 32=7.3%, >=64=0.0%
>       submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
>       complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=94.8%, 8=1.0%, 16=1.5%, 32=2.6%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
>       issued    : total=r=4043164/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
>       latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
>
> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
>     READ: io=15794MB, aggrb=1321.4MB/s, minb=1321.4MB/s, maxb=1321.4MB/s, mint=11953msec, maxt=11953msec
>
>
> async messenger (ms_async_op_threads=10)
> -----------------------------------------
> ^Cbs: 15 (f=15): [r(15)] [0.0% done] [544.6MB/0KB/0KB /s] [139K/0/0 iops] [eta 301d:09h:10m:03s]
> fio: terminating on signal 2
>
> rbd_iodepth32-test: (groupid=0, jobs=15): err= 0: pid=42935: Tue Apr 28 10:24:29 2015
>    read : io=6389.8MB, bw=547856KB/s, iops=136963, runt= 11943msec
>      slat (usec): min=7, max=23454, avg=39.33, stdev=226.05
>      clat (usec): min=58, max=107304, avg=3002.03, stdev=6270.44
>       lat (usec): min=91, max=107327, avg=3041.36, stdev=6279.32
>      clat percentiles (usec):
>       |  1.00th=[  129],  5.00th=[  177], 10.00th=[  229], 20.00th=[  334],
>       | 30.00th=[  446], 40.00th=[  564], 50.00th=[  692], 60.00th=[  836],
>       | 70.00th=[ 1032], 80.00th=[ 1576], 90.00th=[10816], 95.00th=[17792],
>       | 99.00th=[29824], 99.50th=[34048], 99.90th=[42240], 99.95th=[45824],
>       | 99.99th=[50432]
>      bw (KB  /s): min=13359, max=128824, per=6.67%, avg=36544.92, stdev=37000.58
>      lat (usec) : 100=0.04%, 250=12.05%, 500=22.51%, 750=19.70%, 1000=14.66%
>      lat (msec) : 2=12.32%, 4=2.66%, 10=5.34%, 20=6.81%, 50=3.91%
>      lat (msec) : 100=0.01%, 250=0.01%
>    cpu          : usr=19.03%, sys=6.33%, ctx=370760, majf=0, minf=11335
>    IO depths    : 1=0.4%, 2=0.9%, 4=5.3%, 8=20.2%, 16=66.0%, 32=7.3%, >=64=0.0%
>       submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
>       complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=95.5%, 8=0.9%, 16=0.9%, 32=2.8%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
>       issued    : total=r=1635761/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0, drop=r=0/w=0/d=0
>       latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=32
>
> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
>     READ: io=6389.8MB, aggrb=547855KB/s, minb=547855KB/s, maxb=547855KB/s, mint=11943msec, maxt=11943msec
>
>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-28  8:36 async messenger small benchmark result Alexandre DERUMIER
2015-04-28  8:50 ` Haomai Wang
2015-04-28 13:48 ` Mark Nelson [this message]
2015-04-29  6:10   ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2015-04-29  6:21     ` Haomai Wang
2015-04-29  7:52       ` Alexandre DERUMIER

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=553F8FC3.5050502@redhat.com \
    --to=mnelson@redhat.com \
    --cc=aderumier@odiso.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.