From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 2EAA5E00949; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27FAE003A8 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 17D62F811DF; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 07:57:05 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3172F811DC; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 07:57:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <553F91C2.7040105@mlbassoc.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 07:57:22 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org References: <1430109302-25721-1-git-send-email-picmaster@mail.bg> <553E5556.9070406@mail.bg> <553F0915.5090609@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH 1/2] linux-riotboard: Add separate riotboard kernel recipe X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:57:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2015-04-28 07:53, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote: > >> For me, only reverting a patch that has been debugged is not a strong >> enough argument to have a fork (and all the work behind it). But I >> cannot see your future plans for the board. > > Just to add on this: I sent a patch that fixes the reported regression > and Gary confirmed it works, so it seems linux-fslc is useable again > with riotboard. How is this going to be handled? Will you apply your patch upstream and update the meta-fsl-arm recipe, or just add the patch there? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------