From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
jason@lakedaemon.net, andrew@lunn.ch,
sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig: remove obsolete selects
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:07:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553FBE4A.9080603@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150428165428.GF12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
On 28/04/2015 18:54, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:41:41PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> Hi Valentin,
>>
>> On 28/04/2015 18:02, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>>> ARM_ERRATA_753970 is not defined in Kconfig, so that both selects turn
>>> out to be nops. Hence, we can safely remove them.
>>
>> It was already pointed by Paul Bolle a few months ago:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1868817
>>
>> and I thought it was applied.
>>
>> He pointed that the original intent was to select
>> PL310_ERRATA_753970. Initially I was not sure if we needed it. In the
>> meantime I didn't get any answer from the hardware designers but this
>> errata affects the r3p0 version and according to the Cache ID register
>> the PL310 used on these two SoCs were the r3p3.
>
> It's probably something I need to look at when I'm in a more relaxed
> state, and when I have more time to deal with the dreaded email
> backlog...
Do you see any mistake in my reasoning?
Do you think that errata 753970 could be applied on PL310 version
more recent than the r3p0 one ?
Do you think that Cache ID register could give incorrect information
about the PL310 version?
Or maybe you think about something more global.
Thanks,
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 16:02 [PATCH] arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig: remove obsolete selects Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-28 16:41 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-04-28 16:49 ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-28 16:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-28 17:07 ` Gregory CLEMENT [this message]
2015-04-30 13:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-28 18:02 ` Paul Bolle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553FBE4A.9080603@free-electrons.com \
--to=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.