From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 22C9EE009A5; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:24:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED1CE00949 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E77D16002B0A; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 20:24:38 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1430241879; bh=BiUyvZ+sksLBpbQA08e5MTi0K2H9ocF/WBdJPRx0wC0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bmNNB2sZypmLqfn1DiYnBhTWOgXqUxvcvPxhQz7QCPPweQglWFHxTpxpnOMecuzwP kmc1VRp3UJWbDThN2aQzHiwDURu42DRykrHFJFSfPaKMvs58BTE/5WY/X/0ctZlfpQ YxEeF+FlV0Ykv/cV2QOrrbXssPzD0SGWcqA8KUII= Message-ID: <553FC256.2010006@mail.bg> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 20:24:38 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1430109302-25721-1-git-send-email-picmaster@mail.bg> <553E5556.9070406@mail.bg> <553F0915.5090609@mail.bg> <553F91C2.7040105@mlbassoc.com> <553FBEEB.6010706@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Gary Thomas Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH 1/2] linux-riotboard: Add separate riotboard kernel recipe X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:24:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 04/28/2015 08:12 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Nikolay, > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> On 04/28/2015 07:42 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Fabio Estevam >>> wrote: >>> ... >>>> >>>> Applying it on top of 4.0 linux-fslc makes the SD card detection >>>> problem go away. >>> >>> ... >>> >>> I have applied this to linux-fslc tree and applied this to master and >>> fido branches. It should work out of box now. >> >> >> Mainline code worked out of the box in the first place. I'm now >> wondering what's the best way to go forward, as we did a lot of work >> just to return to the starting point. > > This was a regression when enabling support for BT/WIFI reset handling > which Fabio did to support WaRP. The beauty here we support in a > single kernel a huge set of boards and already using the mainline mode > for them. I just feel uncomfortable that we loaded Fabio with additional work, because the boards share a common tree and I didn't have any choice to switch the kernel recipe to a working commit, that's all. Regards, Nikolay