On 04/28/2015 08:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:

>> v6 changes are noted in each patch; in particular, several new
>> patches were added (additional tests, split some patches, conversion
>> to 'struct' instead of 'type'). But most of the changes were in
>> direct response to review comments or rebase fallout, so I kept
>> in Reviewed-by markings where possible, to help focus review on
>> the remainder.
> 
> Looks good to go to me, except for new PATCH 37, where I suggested a
> small change.  Shouldn't hold up this series.  If any other patch still
> lacks my R-by, let me know.

Easier as a followup? Respin just the one patch? Or bite the bullet and
rebase the entire series (fixing the other trivial items and adding R-b
along the way)?

> 
>> I wrote another patch while working on this series, but it was
>> independent enough that I posted it separately (although I based
>> the documentation in this patch as if that, or Markus' alternative,
>> had been applied):
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-04/msg00373.html
> 
> Both need a trivial respin to correct a pasto.  Yours has a more
> elaborate commit message, and a test.  Mine is less code, in part
> because it uses a single qnull object instead of allocating one for each
> use, and it has separate patches for the qobject and the json-parser
> change.
> 
> We can pick one, of we can combine the best of both into a new
> mini-series.  Preferences?

I'll tackle a new mini-series with the best of both (I like your idea of
reusing the same object across all uses, instead of creating a new one
each time, particularly since it resulted in a smaller patch)

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org