All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
	"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next 5/6] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 22:09:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <553cb756-de36-4015-ad13-0c260dec675e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022031643.1351877-6-longman@redhat.com>



在 2026/10/22 11:16, Waiman Long 写道:
> Commit 989ca25c10ca ("selftests/cgroup: Add tests for nohz_full
> housekeeping check") adds a nohz_full test matrix that will only be run
> when a nohz_full boot parameter cover all the CPUs beyond CPUs 0-7. The
> code looks for the first and last CPU numbers in the nohz_full sysfs
> file to determine if that criterion is met. However if there are holes in
> the range (i.e. has ",") the test matrix may be incorrectly run leading
> to unexpected test failure. Fix that by skipping "," and anything after
> that to make sure the first range will cover all the remaining CPUs.
> 
> Fixes: 989ca25c10ca ("selftests/cgroup: Add tests for nohz_full housekeeping check")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> index 8595b6b4b7bf..5bc144836bdf 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
> @@ -111,9 +111,9 @@ echo "" > test/cpuset.cpus
>  #
>  # If nohz_full CPUs have been reserved at boot time, they should not include
>  # CPUs 0-7 as that may fail some of the test cases. On the other hand if the
> -# set of nohz_full CPUs includes all the CPUs except 0-7, we can run a special
> -# set of housekeeping CPUs exhaustion tests to see if the cpuset code will
> -# reject them.
> +# set of nohz_full CPUs includes all the CPUs except 0-7 in a single range
> +# <first>-<last>, we can run a special set of housekeeping CPUs exhaustion
> +# tests to see if the cpuset code will reject them.
>  #
>  FIRST_NOHZ_FULL_CPU=
>  LAST_NOHZ_FULL_CPU=
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ NOHZ_FULL_CPUS=
>  LAST_PRESENT_CPU=$(cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/present | sed -e "s/.*[,-]//")
>  [[ -n "$NOHZ_FULL_CPUS" ]] && {
>  	FIRST_NOHZ_FULL_CPU=$(echo $NOHZ_FULL_CPUS | sed -e "s/[,-].*//")
> -	LAST_NOHZ_FULL_CPU=$(echo $NOHZ_FULL_CPUS | sed -e "s/.*[,-]//")
> +	LAST_NOHZ_FULL_CPU=$(echo $NOHZ_FULL_CPUS | sed -e "s/,.*//;s/.*[-]//")
>  	echo "Boot nohz_full CPUs: $NOHZ_FULL_CPUS"
>  }
>  [[ -n "$FIRST_NOHZ_FULL_CPU" && "$FIRST_NOHZ_FULL_CPU" -le 7 ]] &&

Reviewed-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>
Tested-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-22  3:16 [PATCH-next 0/6] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous bug fixes Waiman Long
2026-10-22  3:16 ` [PATCH-next 1/6] cgroup/cpuset: Find furthest isolated ancestor for invalidated isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-10-22 13:25   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22 16:19     ` Waiman Long
2026-10-23  6:24   ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-23 16:48     ` Waiman Long
2026-10-22  3:16 ` [PATCH-next 2/6] cgroup/cpuset: Properly compute effective xcpus in update_parent_effective_cpumask() Waiman Long
2026-10-22 13:45   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22 14:47     ` Waiman Long
2026-10-23  1:41       ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22 15:00     ` Waiman Long
2026-10-23  1:53       ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-23 20:45         ` Waiman Long
2026-10-26  5:46           ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-23  6:45   ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-23 16:56     ` Waiman Long
2026-10-23  7:42   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22  3:16 ` [PATCH-next 3/6] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect effective_cpus bug in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-23  7:07   ` Ridong Chen
2026-10-23 17:01     ` Waiman Long
2026-10-22  3:16 ` [PATCH-next 4/6] cgroup/cpuset: Minor fixes to prstate_housekeeping_conflict() Waiman Long
2026-10-22 14:15   ` Guopeng Zhang
2026-10-22 14:35     ` Waiman Long
2026-10-22  3:16 ` [PATCH-next 5/6] selftests/cgroup: Check for a single range nohz_full CPUs before running test matrix Waiman Long
2026-10-22 14:09   ` Guopeng Zhang [this message]
2026-10-22  3:16 ` [PATCH-next 6/6] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent recursive call of remote_cpus_update() via update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-10-22 14:23   ` Guopeng Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=553cb756-de36-4015-ad13-0c260dec675e@linux.dev \
    --to=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.