From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>,
Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling of reinitialized mbufs
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 22:42:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5540762.F8r316W7xa@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250823063002.24326-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com>
23/08/2025 08:29, Morten Brørup:
> This series contains three changes:
> - sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf (a.k.a. raw mbuf) was de-inlined
> - reinitialized mbuf free and alloc bulk functions were promoted as stable
> - resetting fields of reinitialized mbufs was optimized, making the reset
> operation write-only of the mbuf, instead of read-modify-write
>
> Morten Brørup (3):
> mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf
> mbuf: promote raw free and alloc bulk functions as stable
> mbuf: optimize reset of reinitialized mbufs
Applied, thanks.
2 notes:
- do you know how much it improves performance?
- it is adding (more or less) new functions directly as stable
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-19 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 15:02 [PATCH v5 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling of reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-21 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-08-21 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] promote reinitialized mbuf free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-08-21 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] mbuf: no need to reset all fields on reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling of " Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 14:26 ` Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] mbuf: promote raw free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] mbuf: no need to reset all fields on reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling of " Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] mbuf: promote raw free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-08-22 23:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] mbuf: optimize reset of reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 6:29 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling " Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 6:30 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] mbuf: de-inline sanity checking a reinitialized mbuf Morten Brørup
2025-10-09 16:49 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-09 17:12 ` Morten Brørup
2025-10-09 17:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-10-09 17:55 ` Morten Brørup
2025-10-19 20:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-08-23 6:30 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] mbuf: promote raw free and alloc bulk functions as stable Morten Brørup
2025-10-09 16:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-08-23 6:30 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] mbuf: optimize reset of reinitialized mbufs Morten Brørup
2025-08-23 14:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-09 17:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-09 17:35 ` Morten Brørup
2025-10-10 7:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-10-10 9:22 ` Morten Brørup
2025-10-19 16:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-10-19 18:45 ` Morten Brørup
2025-10-19 20:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-10-20 8:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2026-03-06 12:19 ` Rahul Bhansali
2026-03-06 14:53 ` Morten Brørup
2026-03-06 16:04 ` Rahul Bhansali
2026-03-06 20:04 ` Morten Brørup
2026-04-01 6:12 ` Rahul Bhansali
2025-10-06 14:43 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] mbuf: simplify handling " Morten Brørup
2025-10-19 20:42 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5540762.F8r316W7xa@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.