Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QJSON: Use OBJECT_CHECK

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 29.04.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:23:20 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 07:05:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 25.04.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
>>>> The QJSON code used casts to (QJSON*) directly, instead of OBJECT_CHECK.
>>>> There were even some functions using object_dynamic_cast() calls
>>>> followed by assert(), which is exactly what OBJECT_CHECK does (by
>>>> calling object_dynamic_cast_assert()).
>>>
>>> Suggest s/OBJECT_CHECK/OBJECT_CHECK()/g everywhere for clarity.
> 
> Everywhere? You mean, in other places?

No, I count 3x in commit message including subject.

Andreas

> In this case someone has to
> post a different patch.
> 
>> I assume it can be fixed during commit by whoever is going to queue it.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  qjson.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
>>>
>>> Wasn't aware QJSON is using QOM - assuming this will go through some
>>> QAPI/QMP tree.
>>
>> The only user of qjson.c right now is migration code. Should it go through
>> the migration tree?
> 
> It could be, but I can take it if nobody does.
> 
>> Also, why do we have two JSON writers in QEMU? And why do they have
>> exactly the same name?
> 
> Not sure I got it, which writers?
> 


-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)