From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1YnSc0-0006MY-Gi for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:05:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnSbx-0006Ks-Nc for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:05:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnSbr-0002lp-TR for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:05:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:32873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnSbr-0002kd-Mm for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:05:07 -0400 Received: by wief7 with SMTP id f7so41106001wie.0 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=OJ2K+fiqYBG+BsIs1IEUqmTwiHe5Y8GjSZPbZjOwzJE=; b=SKWltlCblXamjYFl9fZ/REp4uxxefuA9uIZlwueL2QncLXiTrNrXib7hayZOJMO5BW 8iIi4tO4JaNvZF9U9N/2n35ZxqryHveMFXrzMARM0/Iwv2MLSxVx7mkuMB7irWpuqhI4 PZICjF5AbLLsbDvruQ00iHdyiR9lag4mhpzJx8wT7yjh/mTjk/1aLQqU1FAZW4WR4GHB y6B1JKhNFy7Xv77gFJ5Psej5liBjQFxMVsLp336PBC3aCOIJPNHJrB2LB/BgsZIie3AQ 6WzlTRWbLMenzhRWVpwgOKMUhNGEMZa1yObIiNiawAOGf1pmv4HEO+JWIWzG7rfdYrhu o2CA== X-Received: by 10.180.90.82 with SMTP id bu18mr9108991wib.88.1430316307076; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:0:105f:fd00:863a:4bff:fe50:abc4? ([2620:0:105f:fd00:863a:4bff:fe50:abc4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nb9sm21360238wic.10.2015.04.29.07.05.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5540E510.6040002@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:05:04 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: grub-mkrescue problems in argp_parse References: <553A6734.1030606@gmail.com> <20651564086002247807@scdbackup.webframe.org> In-Reply-To: <20651564086002247807@scdbackup.webframe.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O0RAWkloBE7J5nqGCKDkjQx3gCJn7KgR3" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:05:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --O0RAWkloBE7J5nqGCKDkjQx3gCJn7KgR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24.04.2015 18:31, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Vladimir wrote: >> In all I kinda like >> that grub-mkrescue would be drop-in replacement for xorrisofs/mkisofs >> with additional boot semantics. Unfortunately it requires additional >> discipline of avoiding option clashes like this one. >=20 > You would have to reserve option names within xorriso's > command set and its -as mkisofs option set. I would then > avoid to give them a meaning in those sets. > You would also have to resolve the old collision -v. >=20 -v collision is fixed. We need for compatibility: -o -? -d -k --output --rom-directory --xorriso --grub-glue-efi --grub-render-label --label-font --label-color --label-bgcolor --product-name --product-version --sparc-boot --arcs-boot --modules --install-modules --themes --fonts --locales --compress --core-compress --directory --override-directory --locale-directory --themes-directory --grub-mkimage --pubkey --verbose Are any of those a problem? In future we can make a rule to add only options starting with --. We can add a test to ensure this. Do we need any other requirements to avoid clashes? > There are further incompatibilities between old and new > grub-mkrescue by the not yet implemented old options=20 > --modules > --grub-mkimage > --override-directory > Will they be re-introduced ? (Should they ? What did they do ?) >=20 They're there. If you have data suggesting otherwise, please detail it >=20 >> In principle I'm ok with having more elegant command line if the name = of >> tool changes. >=20 > Please count 1 vote for "grub-mkiso". :)) > As said, both personalities could share one body to avoid > duplication of maintainance effort. >=20 > I propose to describe the new CLI in the docs as "unambiguous" > rather than as "more elegant". >=20 >=20 > Have a nice day :) >=20 > Thomas >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel > . >=20 --O0RAWkloBE7J5nqGCKDkjQx3gCJn7KgR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iF4EAREKAAYFAlVA5RAACgkQmBXlbbo5nOs9wwD+LcIKEUzTJlU7sN2coCo9uun/ V9ooYrtlzsonOoDus+YA/AnoWRuMnDCVULZTytvIMVsG1JNuobw3lZWvmxlUQHkX =GK2J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O0RAWkloBE7J5nqGCKDkjQx3gCJn7KgR3--