From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YnarA-0007UM-Fy for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 22:53:30 +0000 Message-ID: <554160D1.70809@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:53:05 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Netlink Antenna Support References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Brandon Enochs Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 04/29/2015 01:24 PM, Brandon Enochs wrote: > Does anyone know if the ath10k driver will, at some point, support > netlink antenna masking? The ath9k card supported this. Further, > will multiple antenna/signal strength pairs be supported like in the > ath9k driver? ath10k supports setting the antennas in use (nss). You can use chains: 0, 0+1, or 0+1+2, just like ath9k. I don't think ath10k has any logic to report any of the details about antenna signal strength for received frames. Thanks, Ben > > Thanks, > Brandon > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k