From: Cao Minh Hiep <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
To: Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org
Cc: broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
ryusuke.sakato.bx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: Re-do the returning value of rspi_dma_check_then_transfer
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:33:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55417862.4010800@jinso.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <553F72F1.9010300-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Hi Sergei-san,
>> To reduce indentation and complex of code, insteeds of returning zero,
>
> Complexity?
>
>> the function rspi_dma_check_then_transfer should be returned
>
> Returning? Or perhaps just "return", without "be"?
>
Thanks for pointing this out. I'll update it.
Hiep.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cao Minh Hiep <cm-hiep-HEF513clHfp3+QwDJ9on6Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org
Cc: broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
ryusuke.sakato.bx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: Re-do the returning value of rspi_dma_check_then_transfer
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:33:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55417862.4010800@jinso.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <553F72F1.9010300-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Hi Sergei-san,
>> To reduce indentation and complex of code, insteeds of returning zero,
>
> Complexity?
>
>> the function rspi_dma_check_then_transfer should be returned
>
> Returning? Or perhaps just "return", without "be"?
>
Thanks for pointing this out. I'll update it.
Hiep.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 5:55 [PATCH 0/3 v2] spi: Re-do correctly function name and 'ret' return value Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 5:55 ` Cao Minh Hiep
[not found] ` <1430200551-20708-1-git-send-email-cm-hiep-HEF513clHfp3+QwDJ9on6Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-28 5:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] spi: Re-do the returning value of rspi_dma_check_then_transfer Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 5:55 ` Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 9:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-28 9:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdU8fHW9SCHPTpjwQMfsQc7Qn3F29-P2tsi_j-4Pjp_QCg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-30 0:26 ` Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-30 0:26 ` Cao Minh Hiep
[not found] ` <1430200551-20708-2-git-send-email-cm-hiep-HEF513clHfp3+QwDJ9on6Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-28 11:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-04-28 11:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
[not found] ` <553F72F1.9010300-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-30 0:33 ` Cao Minh Hiep [this message]
2015-04-30 0:33 ` Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 5:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] spi: modify the name of qspi_trigger_transfer_out_int function Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 5:55 ` Cao Minh Hiep
[not found] ` <1430200551-20708-3-git-send-email-cm-hiep-HEF513clHfp3+QwDJ9on6Q@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-28 11:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-28 11:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-30 0:27 ` Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-30 0:27 ` Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 5:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] spi: Re-do the returning value of qspi_transfer_out_in Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 5:55 ` Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-28 11:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-28 11:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-30 0:28 ` Cao Minh Hiep
2015-04-30 0:28 ` Cao Minh Hiep
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55417862.4010800@jinso.co.jp \
--to=cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ryusuke.sakato.bx-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh-zM6kxYcvzFBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.