From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com,
jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
cphealy@gmail.com, mathieu@codeaurora.org, jonasj76@gmail.com,
andrey.volkov@nexvision.fr, Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:50:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55425D5C.1020101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150430131216.GC22831@lunn.ch>
On 30/04/15 06:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Note that there are currenlty no incompatibles changes made to existing Device
>> Tree sources, rather, depending on the bus we are probed for, e.g: MDIO
>> the dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet phandles and first cell of the "reg" property
>> will become obsolete, everything else remains entirely compatible.
>
> Hi Florian
>
> I'm not sure dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet will become obsolete. At
> least they are probably needed for multi switch setups, and the
> possible but probably unlikely multi DSA setups.
>
> You cannot assume that dsa,mii-bus and dsa,ethernet have the same
> parent. In a multi switch setup, it could be there is an mdio-mux in
> the picture. So all your probe really tells you, is that there is a
> switch on this mii bus, but you don't know what ethernet it is hanging
> off.
Good point.
>
> The switch could be hanging off multiple ethernets. I'm working on
> supporting this for the WRT1900AC, where i use the bond driver on the
> host side. So dsa,ethernet is a phandle to a bond interface.
Humm, bond is a software constructs, don't you rather want two phandles
to the relevant Ethernet interfaces instead and then learn through
netlink/netdevice notifiers that these are eventually part of the same bond?
>
> The probe is likely to find all switches in a multi switch setup. But
> i guess we only want the probe of the root devices in a switch tree to
> cause a DSA setup.
Right.
>
> So i think there needs to be some matching performed when looking in
> the device tree. The dsa,mii-bus and address discovered by probing
> need to match what is in the DSA properties.
Sure, that's a good point. I tried to start with simple case first, if
you can recommend consumer/off the shelf hardware which has a cascaded
setup, that could help too.
The configuration I have access to with Broadcom switches looks like
this: internal SF2 switch MMIO-mapped, with an external RGMII interface
to a MDIO connected BCM53125 switch.
so this not a true switch tree here, they can (and should) be treated as
different switch trees, attached to different interfaces: eth0 for CPU
for the internal one and the DSA-created "rgmii" interface for the
second switch.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 1:57 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/8] net: dsa: Move dsa_switch_tree final setup in separate function Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:01 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/8] net: phy: Check fixup lists in get_phy_device() Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:02 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/8] net: phy: Allow PHY devices to identify themselves as Ethernet switches Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 12:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 16:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 18:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 18:19 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/8] net: mv643xx_eth: Handle Ethernet switches as PHY devices Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:06 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: add new API to register switch devices Florian Fainelli
2015-05-04 2:09 ` David Miller
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/8] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: make it a real platform driver Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 7/8] net: dsa: mv88e6060: make it a proper PHY driver Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 12:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 13:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-30 16:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 17:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-01 2:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-01 6:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 1:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Allow them to be proper PHY drivers Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 13:12 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: New registration API Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 16:50 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-04-30 17:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-30 17:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-04-30 18:14 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55425D5C.1020101@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrey.volkov@nexvision.fr \
--cc=cphealy@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jerome.oufella@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=jonasj76@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mathieu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.