From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E9118E0095C; Fri, 1 May 2015 05:39:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8D3E0049A for ; Fri, 1 May 2015 05:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85F686000FEC; Fri, 1 May 2015 15:39:37 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1430483977; bh=NViurje9dv1ZUGGGOHR9jx3yZKCFjg126kW5xbqZ5Js=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tkCPVzHXq39bPXRIGIE4VNY8MhlUwD0YXGPvDB76TybxjjuBKerLPuTCAqkTizJLw 002l3YErnbPqc+6YR82Xp2bvE0kEdeKbG+3MYRuia824xbA/lnTRK+C7oJOMIHaV6S b2+2UJkw6g/hNRSgZTELaWO0EYp5RSSj979AIsR0= Message-ID: <55437409.7020408@mail.bg> Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 15:39:37 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas References: <553814A4.5070000@mlbassoc.com> <55383A59.805@mail.bg> <55436C3C.6070807@mail.bg> <5543721D.2080407@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: <5543721D.2080407@mlbassoc.com> Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra] Booting RIoTboard X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 12:39:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Gary, On 05/01/2015 03:31 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2015-05-01 06:06, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> Hi Gary, >> >> On 04/23/2015 03:18 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >>> Hi Gary, >>> >>> On 04/23/2015 12:37 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>>> I've just built an image for the i.MX6DL/RIoTboard using the latest >>>> master (fido). I had to add this line to local.conf: >>>> MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS_remove_imx6dl-riotboard = >>>> "fsl-alsa-plugins" as the fsl-alsa-plugins won't currently build with >>>> Linux-4.0 >>>> >>>> Now I'm trying to boot the image. I've copied it to my SD card and >>>> set the switches appropriately (I found two web pages about this and >>>> they have conflicting information! The answer seems to be >>>> SW1-SW8=On/Off/On/Off/Off/On/Off/On) >>> >>> I have 2 riotboards both booting from sdcards, here are their >>> configurations: >>> - slot J6 (USDHC2), SW1-8 = On/Off/On/Off/Off/On/On/Off >>> - slot J7 (USDHC3), SW1-8 = On/Off/On/Off/Off/On/Off/On >> >> Just wanted to follow-up on this topic, probably due to curiosity. I >> did some experiments and I can agree with you that the switch positions >> definitely don't follow the docs (1 = On, 0 = Off, X = don't care): >> >> J6 boot ok: 10100 XXX >> >> J7 boot ok: 10100 010 >> 10100 110 > > I think more correctly this would be: > J6 boot: 10100 X0X > J7 boot: 10100 X1X Well, it's not a matter of correctness, but facts. My riotboard can boot from J6 regardless of the 3 rightmost switches. Also, SW8 needs to be Off in order to boot from J7. You can try it on your board. >> So I guess this somewhat explains the confusion. >> >> I've looked at the schematic some months ago to map which boot signals >> goes to which switch, so the only way to explain this unexpected (to >> me) behavior is either a mistake on my side when tracing the signals or >> something different about the imx6s bootrom. Or me reading the wrong RM >> :). Regards, Nikolay