From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id BE055E0095C; Fri, 1 May 2015 06:04:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1ADE0049A for ; Fri, 1 May 2015 06:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66EDD6000EC9; Fri, 1 May 2015 16:04:37 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1430485477; bh=WUcZR/ZSGvDxDyjHKeXgHbriro960fKT8377Kq/Tlg0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=lz/ZzE0IZdxhec3PLaZqxreEnQWF2gaxCrnW7kIRHJIC46GLyV3KpfTXLO8lND3pa JkGQy2mEVEmGdX8OzkcjMtn1KD0ukiyhQgR8cxwow7PUyil5A3AtHVg+fLMkGKh9KA NRV1e/9LpKwxZGaN7azaf9E2DYkt83EbteA894R8= Message-ID: <554379E5.7070906@mail.bg> Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 16:04:37 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Thomas References: <553814A4.5070000@mlbassoc.com> <55383A59.805@mail.bg> <55436C3C.6070807@mail.bg> <5543721D.2080407@mlbassoc.com> <55437409.7020408@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: <55437409.7020408@mail.bg> Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra] Booting RIoTboard X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 13:04:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/01/2015 03:39 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >>> Just wanted to follow-up on this topic, probably due to curiosity. I >>> did some experiments and I can agree with you that the switch positions >>> definitely don't follow the docs (1 = On, 0 = Off, X = don't care): >>> >>> J6 boot ok: 10100 XXX >>> >>> J7 boot ok: 10100 010 >>> 10100 110 Found why the board behaves this way when booting from J6. Boot switches 10100 XXX works only for POR resets. For WDOG reset the working switch positions are 10100 X01, otherwise reboot command will not reboot the board. Regards, Nikolay