From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: marc.mari.barcelo@gmail.com, afaerber@suse.de, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] libqos/ahci: Swap memread/write with bufread/write
Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 22:48:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5543E688.6020703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430510112-30474-5-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com>
On 01/05/2015 21:55, John Snow wrote:
> Where it makes sense, use the new faster primitives.
> For generally small reads/writes such as for the PRDT
> and FIS packets, stick with the more wasteful but
> easier to debug memread/memwrite.
>
> For ahci-test;
> With this patch:
> real 0m4.802s
> user 0m3.506s
> sys 0m2.393s
>
> Without this series:
> real 0m14.171s
> user 0m12.072s
> sys 0m12.527s
The overhead of memread is 2, the overhead of base64 is 1.33, also
base64 should have a larger cost of computing each byte. It doesn't add up.
Could it be simply that calling qtest_send (and hence
vsnprintf+qemu_chr_fe_write_all, neither of which are speed demons) once
per byte is hideously inefficient? :)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-01 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-01 19:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] qtest: base64 r/w and faster memset John Snow
2015-05-01 19:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] qtest: allow arbitrarily long sends John Snow
2015-05-01 19:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] qtest: Add base64 encoded read/write John Snow
2015-05-01 19:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] qtest: add memset to qtest protocol John Snow
2015-05-01 19:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] libqos/ahci: Swap memread/write with bufread/write John Snow
2015-05-01 20:48 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-05-01 21:04 ` John Snow
2015-05-02 0:13 ` John Snow
2015-05-05 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 15:48 ` John Snow
2015-05-05 16:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 16:26 ` John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5543E688.6020703@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=marc.mari.barcelo@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.