From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: remove one useless check extension
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:24:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55473AC6.6020206@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430707729-8175-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
On 04/05/2015 04:48, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> We already check KVM_CAP_IRQFD in generic once enable CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD,
>
> kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic()
> |
> + switch (arg) {
> + ...
> + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> + #endif
> + ...
> + return 1;
> + ...
> + }
> |
> + kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension()
>
> So its not necessary to check this in arch again, and also fix one typo,
> s/emlation/emulation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 1 -
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index d9631ec..483b5d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> int r;
> switch (ext) {
> case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
> - case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
> case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 4b60056..2fa7302 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_hvm_config {
> *
> * KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE indicates resamplefd is valid and specifies
> * the irqfd to operate in resampling mode for level triggered interrupt
> - * emlation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> + * emulation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> */
> #define KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE (1 << 1)
>
>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Christoffer/Marc, please apply to the ARM tree in order to avoid
pointless conflicts in kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 2:48 [PATCH] kvm: remove one useless check extension Tiejun Chen
2015-05-04 9:24 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-05-05 12:21 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55473AC6.6020206@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.