All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: geoff@infradead.org
Cc: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] arm64: disable/enable d-cache support for
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 20:11:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5547852F.8030309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1430742915.git.panand@redhat.com>



On Monday 04 May 2015 06:32 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> These patches add support for enable/disable d cache support. It reduces
> time for sha verification from more than 2 min to 3-4 sec on my
> platform.
> There are some of the observation which I am unable to explain.
> * It takes around 18 sec when I boot a kexec kernel and around 3-4 sec
> * when I boot a crash kernel. In case of kexec kernel start of 1st
> * segment is at 0000004000280000 and, end of last segment is at
> * 00000040029c0000. In case of crash kernel start of 1st segment is at
> * 00000041b9080000 and, end of last segment is at 00000041f9000000.

There is one more observation which is not explainable :(
While executing a secondary kernel using kexec -e, if sha256_process() 
function is aligned at offset 256, it takes 18 sec else it takes double 
ie 36 sec.

# objdump -d purgatory/purgatory.ro | grep sha256_process
0000000000001300 <sha256_process>:

-> takes 18 sec

If because of some changes in code, this function shifts a bit
# objdump -d purgatory/purgatory.ro | grep sha256_process
0000000000001310 <sha256_process>:

-> takes 36 sec.

So,  "__attribute__ ((aligned (256))) void sha256_process( 
sha256_context *ctx, const uint8_t data[64] )" guarantees constant 
execution time, but how can this be justified?

~Pratyush


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 13:02 [PATCH RFC 0/3] arm64: disable/enable d-cache support for Pratyush Anand
2015-05-04 13:02 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] arm64: Add enable/disable d-cache support for purgatory Pratyush Anand
2015-05-04 13:02 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] arm64: Pass RAM boundary to purgatory Pratyush Anand
2015-05-04 13:02 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] arm64: Enable/disable D-cache before/after sha verification Pratyush Anand
2015-05-04 14:41 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2015-05-06 17:05 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] arm64: disable/enable d-cache support for Geoff Levand
2015-05-06 17:37   ` Pratyush Anand
2015-05-07  4:25     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-07  4:54       ` Pratyush Anand
2015-05-07  5:08         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2015-05-07 15:32         ` Geoff Levand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5547852F.8030309@redhat.com \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.