All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: don't lose requests if a stopped queue restarts
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 13:17:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5547C5BF.2030703@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <430595847fe98f99e1c8ea79b018003d9315f905.1430613052.git.shli@fb.com>

On 05/02/2015 06:31 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Normally if driver is busy to dispatch a request the logic is like below:
> block layer:					driver:
> 	__blk_mq_run_hw_queue
> a.						blk_mq_stop_hw_queue
> b.	rq add to ctx->dispatch
>
> later:
> 1.						blk_mq_start_hw_queue
> 2.	__blk_mq_run_hw_queue
>
> But it's possible step 1-2 runs between a and b. And since rq isn't in
> ctx->dispatch yet, step 2 will not run rq. The rq might get lost if
> there are no subsequent requests kick in.

Good catch! But the patch introduces a potentially never ending loop in 
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue(). Not sure how we can fully close it, but it 
might be better to punt the re-run after adding the requests back to the 
worker. That would turn a potential busy loop (until requests complete) 
into something with nicer behavior, at least. Ala

if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state))
      kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
                                         &hctx->run_work, 0);


-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-03  0:31 [PATCH] blk-mq: don't lose requests if a stopped queue restarts Shaohua Li
2015-05-04 19:17 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-05-04 19:51   ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-04 19:56     ` Jens Axboe
2015-05-04 20:20       ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-04 20:33         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5547C5BF.2030703@fb.com \
    --to=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.