From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 11:17:27 +0200 Message-ID: <55488AA7.5020709@dachary.org> References: <55362279.5060105@dachary.org> <55367E8D.1090805@redhat.com> <5537229F.4050501@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FVEmubRRQRCKprCPHHKVCj4luRspVV6uN" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:57606 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbbEEJR3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2015 05:17:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5537229F.4050501@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Zafman Cc: "Shu, Xinxin" , Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --FVEmubRRQRCKprCPHHKVCj4luRspVV6uN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, These changes have been merged in ceph-qa-suite for about two weeks now, = did you notice problems ? Cheers On 22/04/2015 06:25, David Zafman wrote: >=20 > All the changes for testing are in ceph-qa-suite firefly branch. >=20 > After updating from the git repo, the firefly branch doesn't include th= ese 2 commits. Was there an issue with this change? >=20 > David >=20 > commit 71624947a338dabb6ed71d94e2e003bf984074cc > Merge: 3da69ba 35ee8e0 > Author: Loic Dachary > Date: Fri Apr 3 10:47:42 2015 +0200 >=20 > Merge pull request #394 from dzafman/wip-11139-firefly >=20 > ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool i= mport >=20 > Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary >=20 > commit 35ee8e0d4e1e8cac61ff9f5d8d644f93de4cdf60 > Author: David Zafman > Date: Fri Mar 20 19:56:55 2015 -0700 >=20 > ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-tool i= mport >=20 > Fixes: #11139 >=20 > Signed-off-by: David Zafman > (cherry picked from commit 6c5300552d00232d6ecb2c1aa641d515c9d8cd34= ) >=20 > David >=20 > On 4/21/15 7:39 PM, Samuel Just wrote: >> >> Ok, so ceoh_objectstrore_tool is being tested in firefly as part of th= e current firefly ceph-qa-suite branch? >> -Sam >> >> Sent from Nine >> >> *From:* David Zafman >> *Sent:* Apr 21, 2015 10:16 PM >> *To:* Sage Weil;Loic Dachary >> *Cc:* Ceph Development;Shu, Xinxin;sjust@redhat.com >> *Subject:* Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? >> >> >> >> In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the >> ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly). We considered it >> passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen: >> >> bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --op >> list-pgs >> >> David >> >> >> On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get i= nto a >> > release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashin= g >> > tests yet? >> > >> > The only other one I'm worried about is >> > >> > 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup >> > >> > Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly = folks >> > who upgrade too? >> > >> > sage >> > >> > >> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Sage, >> >> >> >> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/= issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in= the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and ar= e being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues= /11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-inte= gration-branch-april-2015 ). >> >> >> >> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Sho= uld we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backpor= ting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ? >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> >> >> --=20 >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" = in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --FVEmubRRQRCKprCPHHKVCj4luRspVV6uN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVIiqcACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23G9QCaAhgYKb9BfzILFk2QLtWC2jV2 0/IAoLh/MxCf2f8qz3qY9EFi+DekcYuC =oMtw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FVEmubRRQRCKprCPHHKVCj4luRspVV6uN--