From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Zafman Subject: Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 11:58:30 -0700 Message-ID: <554912D6.7000204@redhat.com> References: <55362279.5060105@dachary.org> <55367E8D.1090805@redhat.com> <5537229F.4050501@redhat.com> <55488AA7.5020709@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44521 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbbEES7g (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2015 14:59:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55488AA7.5020709@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: "Shu, Xinxin" , Ceph Development The only issue with not having wip-11139-firefly merged is getting fals= e=20 test failures. So I can't see how this would impact the point release. David On 5/5/15 2:17 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi David, > > These changes have been merged in ceph-qa-suite for about two weeks n= ow, did you notice problems ? > > Cheers > > On 22/04/2015 06:25, David Zafman wrote: >> All the changes for testing are in ceph-qa-suite firefly branch. >> >> After updating from the git repo, the firefly branch doesn't include= these 2 commits. Was there an issue with this change? >> >> David >> >> commit 71624947a338dabb6ed71d94e2e003bf984074cc >> Merge: 3da69ba 35ee8e0 >> Author: Loic Dachary >> Date: Fri Apr 3 10:47:42 2015 +0200 >> >> Merge pull request #394 from dzafman/wip-11139-firefly >> >> ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-to= ol import >> >> Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary >> >> commit 35ee8e0d4e1e8cac61ff9f5d8d644f93de4cdf60 >> Author: David Zafman >> Date: Fri Mar 20 19:56:55 2015 -0700 >> >> ceph_manager: Check for exit status 11 from ceph-objectstore-to= ol import >> >> Fixes: #11139 >> >> Signed-off-by: David Zafman >> (cherry picked from commit 6c5300552d00232d6ecb2c1aa641d515c9d8= cd34) >> >> David >> >> On 4/21/15 7:39 PM, Samuel Just wrote: >>> Ok, so ceoh_objectstrore_tool is being tested in firefly as part of= the current firefly ceph-qa-suite branch? >>> -Sam >>> >>> Sent from Nine >>> >>> *From:* David Zafman >>> *Sent:* Apr 21, 2015 10:16 PM >>> *To:* Sage Weil;Loic Dachary >>> *Cc:* Ceph Development;Shu, Xinxin;sjust@redhat.com >>> *Subject:* Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> In early march I ran rados:thrash on the firefly backport of the >>> ceph-objectstore-tool changes (wip-cot-firefly). We considered it >>> passed, even though an obscure segfault was seen: >>> >>> bug #11141: Segmentation Violation: ceph-objectstore-tool doing --o= p >>> list-pgs >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> On 4/21/15 8:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >>>> The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get= into a >>>> release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrash= ing >>>> tests yet? >>>> >>>> The only other one I'm worried about is >>>> >>>> 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup >>>> >>>> Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefl= y folks >>>> who upgrade too? >>>> >>>> sage >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Sage, >>>>> >>>>> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.co= m/issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade test= s in the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since = and are being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.co= m/issues/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f25= 49f79-integration-branch-april-2015 ). >>>>> >>>>> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? S= hould we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep bac= kporting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>> --=20 >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-deve= l" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >>> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html